Transfer Rumours January Incoming/Outgoing...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Hutch-tiger69 said:
Crikey
Is that the new gripe we arnt signing players quick enough hahahaha ffs

Is nobody happy on here?
Click to expand...
People will always find something to moan about. They seem to think you just identify a target and then ring up and say 'yeah we will have him' and that's the end of that! In an ideal world i'm sure Silva would like the players in the door now, but if people take there blinkers off they will acknowledge that football doesn't work like that!
 
SydneyTiger14 said:
The entire concept of a rolling contract is that it has to roll over. Rolling over is essentially renewing.
Click to expand...
A rolling contract does not get renewed.It always has at least the minimum period quoted ie. 1 year to run.

If either party wants to opt out it then crystallises into a one year contract from the date the opt out was discussed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: petersaxton
Stevielidds1983 said:
People will always find something to moan about. They seem to think you just identify a target and then ring up and say 'yeah we will have him' and that's the end of that! In an ideal world i'm sure Silva would like the players in the door now, but if people take there blinkers off they will acknowledge that football doesn't work like that!
Click to expand...

But that would include being realistic, you know that most people can't manage that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stevielidds1983
ElTigre said:
I have no idea whether Snodgrass was telling the whole world he had an existing problem before signing for City or whether he only talked about it after he dislocated it in his first game for City. I'm just going on what BCB said.
Click to expand...

But that doesn't matter - as I said before why do you think buying clubs conduct medicals? It's up to us to spot an issue, we sign the player as seen.

There's nothing difficult to grasp here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fez
Hutch-tiger69 said:
Crikey
Is that the new gripe we arnt signing players quick enough hahahaha ffs

Is nobody happy on here?
Click to expand...


The quicker you sign players, the more games they can play, the stronger the team is, the more games we can win. In a team that before the transfer window was crying out for players and has since sold 2 players (subject to SNodgrass deal going through).

It isn't rocket science.

Seems like hipsters choice is to be contrary at the moment. A sense of superiority in defying logic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PLT
Stevielidds1983 said:
People will always find something to moan about. They seem to think you just identify a target and then ring up and say 'yeah we will have him' and that's the end of that! In an ideal world i'm sure Silva would like the players in the door now, but if people take there blinkers off they will acknowledge that football doesn't work like that!
Click to expand...


The tedium of devil's advocacy.
 
Bigelow said:
The quicker you sign players, the more games they can play, the stronger the team is, the more games we can win. In a team that before the transfer window was crying out for players and has since sold 2 players (subject to SNodgrass deal going through).

It isn't rocket science.

Seems like hipsters choice is to be contrary at the moment. A sense of superiority in defying logic.
Click to expand...
Completely agree with you, however real life football is not like a computer game where you can immediately sign players.

I have no doubts we are actively going for the 3-4 players Silva is after, but they will take time
 
Don't know if this has been posted, Sky reporting West Ham deal is for 6m plus add ons.
Rubbish deal if true.
 
Bigelow said:
The quicker you sign players, the more games they can play, the stronger the team is, the more games we can win. In a team that before the transfer window was crying out for players and has since sold 2 players (subject to SNodgrass deal going through).

It isn't rocket science.

Seems like hipsters choice is to be contrary at the moment. A sense of superiority in defying logic.
Click to expand...

And it isnt as black and white as your trying to make it, to justify another pathetic whine at the allams
Seems like the choice at the minute is gripe at everything and be unrealistic, rather than take any positives whatsover, such as niasse, markovic, elabdalloui and evandro as well as 3/4 in the pipeline

Im kinda starting to realise how potential new owners could be put off
 
  • Like
Reactions: Howden Tigress and Chazz Rheinhold
Stevielidds1983 said:
People will always find something to moan about. They seem to think you just identify a target and then ring up and say 'yeah we rwill have him' and that's the end of that! In an ideal world i'm sure Silva would like the players in the door now, but if people take there blinkers off they will acknowledge that football doesn't work like that!
Click to expand...

Im all for staying positive i think if marco had come in and signed players like will keane and weir fair play have a moan. But weved signed some hungry players with points to prove who look pretty good to be fair, couple that with bowen and tymon looking very promising not to mention beating a full strength united side, winning 3 outta 5 and transforming a team from 30% possesion while being scared to death camped in our own half to 60% possession and playing very sexy ****ing football while at it, (deep breath) and id say its very ****ing enjoyable :)

But wait lets nit pick its all about the allams now
I think some are too obsessed and let it drown out the positives
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stevielidds1983, Fez and DarbyDays
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back