Unless they simply say they will guarantee continuing the funding, then that issue no longer exists.
So long as people trust UK politicians to deliver what they promise. Oh, wait...
Unless they simply say they will guarantee continuing the funding, then that issue no longer exists.
So long as people trust UK politicians to deliver what they promise. Oh, wait...
They can always write it into a piece of legislation. I wouldn't trust any politicians tbh.
As has been said before, there are a number of EU countries that would not like to encourage separatist movements within their own countries and so I can't see that happening. An example is Spain.If you're the EU right now, it would be political suicide not to support Scotland in any attempt to remain in there. They will provide all sorts of incentives. I also think the scottish people would go for it.
Where I think it will fall down is the UK government agreeing to it.
!
Northern Ireland will not be joining the Republic anytime soon as the Republic are directly affected by Brexit and so unification would and should be the last thing that will be on their minds.Are you just metaphorically sticking your fingers in your ears?
Who can? How?
If the number of EU students at Scottish universities goes down do they get to claim compensation for lost income as well as having their funding guaranteed by some magical unchangeable legislation?
In which case we have the situation that Brexit means we just threw away billions of pounds for nothing changing except some racists get to feel like they won something (note to Gerrez just an exaggeration)
If the Scottish Parliament demands a vote before the UK exit from the EU is confirmed, then there's next to **** all that Westminster can do to deny it, both politically and from the social aspect. If there's a huge groundswell of opinion that wants it, it'll happen at their time of choosing not Westminsters.Read my comment again, then calm down. I've said that even if the Scottish Parliament wants to go for another referendum this current government won't allow it before 2020 and will have reasonable excuses why. Before Holyrood tries to pass a bill for a referendum they will also look to get the agreement from the UK government before casting the vote which the government can drag its heels with.
If the Scottish Parliament demands a vote before the UK exit from the EU is confirmed, then there's next to **** all that Westminster can do to deny it, both politically and from the social aspect. If there's a huge groundswell of opinion that wants it, it'll happen at their time of choosing not Westminsters.
They will of course firstly have to gauge whether there is popular support for another referendum and then secondly make a case to the Scottish people to vote on. They cannot just dust off the phish that was in the white paper seeing as the economic environment has clearly changed.If the Scottish Parliament demands a vote before the UK exit from the EU is confirmed, then there's next to **** all that Westminster can do to deny it, both politically and from the social aspect. If there's a huge groundswell of opinion that wants it, it'll happen at their time of choosing not Westminsters.
Johnson was pro EU before Cameron decided to give his party an open vote and the right to campaign against remain.It's getting up there. Can't see it changing anything but it's a little bit of hope for those still stunned by yesterday's result. I hope it triggers another referendum although I'm not sure if the legal conditions about turnout percentage and the percentage of the victory margin it cites are actually true
Honestly, I don't think Leave expected to win. Johnson and Gove have looked ghostly when confronted by the press in the last 24 hours. And the voters, I think a lot of them went Leave thinking it would be a protest vote, the status quo would stay the same, i.e. we'd stay in Europe, but the point would have been made about the country's discontent and desire for reform and that reform would be triggered. Instead they've actually won. And there's no contingency plan
Calais Tells Britain: 'Take Back Your Border'
You must log in or register to see images
Sky News
25 June 2016
They'll judge the best time to push for it. If I was them, I'd give it 12-18 months plus, when the real economic reality of this monumental **** up is biting hard. They can then remind the Scots who was responsible for it, and that they can escape the malaise.They will of course firstly have to gauge whether there is popular support for another referendum and then secondly make a case to the Scottish people to vote on. They cannot just dust off the phish that was in the white paper seeing as the economic environment has clearly changed.
French politicians are demanding that Britain takes back its border after voting to leave the European Union.That link doesn't work. Also I'm pretty sure I read that the French government have already said the agreement we have in place re Calais will remain.
The irony is that the biggest leave voters have been the residents of Folkestone Dover and rest of Kent. They benefit from having the passport control on French soil. Will there be multiple detention centres in Dover?Calais Tells Britain: 'Take Back Your Border'
You must log in or register to see images
Sky News
25 June 2016
Given that it's the Mayor and not a French MP I don't think we have to worry unduly just yet. This was a bilateral agreement that was not linked to EU membership and so the Mayor is just chancing her arm, and of course it sells news.French politicians are demanding that Britain takes back its border after voting to leave the European Union.
The Mayor of Calais Natacha Bouchart said an immigration deal which allows Britain to check passports in France, preventing migrants from crossing the Channel, should be renegotiated.
Ms Bouchart told French broadcaster BFM TV: "The British must take on the consequences of their choice.
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/calais-tells-britain-back-border-195843138.html?nhp=1
I think we shouldn't be relieved either. She is obviously reflecting current thinking.Why would the French be helpful to the British anymore?Given that it's the Mayor and not a French MP I don't think we have to worry unduly just yet. This was a bilateral agreement that was not linked to EU membership and so the Mayor is just chancing her arm, and of course it sells news.
I think we shouldn't be relieved either. She is obviously reflecting current thinking.Why would the French be helpful to the British anymore?
I've said all along we would probably need to do some appeasing of Scotland upon an exit vote, guarantee all the current EU funding and do a good enough deal with the EU that the scots don't feel like they are losing out and they will happily stay.
If Scotland left us to join the EU it would be seen as embarrassing for the uk, but wouldn't particularly damage our negotiating position. Also other EU nations with separatist movements won't be keen on taking in Scotland. The economic plan for an exit however which didn't convince the Scottish people in 2014 was based largely on oil revenue which is now massively effected by volatile prices which are less than half what they were then. The Scottish people will be worse off outside of the U.K. but inside the EU. The numbers for independance don't work anymore, if you even believe they worked in 2014.