Richard Dawkins said in an interview that the issues in the referendum were too complex for most of the general population to understand within that tight time frame.
He said he didn't mean to be patronising. I think that he has a point. We did discuss before the vote how some people would just go with their gut/basic instinct: migration means no school places or council housing.
The Welsh didn't even realise that a lot if their income was from the EU.![]()
Extend the logic....Most macro economic policies are complex...running departments as big as the NHS, Foreign Office etc are complex.
Fairly sure most of the electorate don't know the first thing about most of how what is provided to them is operated. Just as long as they get it.
He does mean to be patronising and it depresses me...even after the ordinary person, using the wrong medium granted, has told the elites to stop patronising them...what do they do?
Guardianistas call them little Englanders.
Academics tell them they are not smart enough.
The labour party tells them they are so stupid they not only voted for the Tories they voted Brexit.
Only people not getting it are the elites..and until they do...this will happen time and time again. Anger...distrust...acting out.
So to extend the logic...why give anyone that isn't deemed fit the vote at all..I mean voting Tory? Disqualification...Etc etc.
Sounds very like the arguments before universal suffrage...the kind of thing the old Tories would say about the peasants...blacks... women...too immature..too child like...too emotional.
I find it hilarious that it's coming from the supposed people who claim to represent and fight for the ordinary folk.
We demand democracy! As long as the result goes our way!