I see on the OS, Russell claims "we need 95 points". That is the amount I forecast we would get when we all made our predictions early December and the total points garnered since then exactly match my forecast (although my individual match forecasts were hopeless) so it is still my prediction. We would need to win our four remaining home games and pick up one away point (or the equivalent). That is all very doable, but by no means a walk in the park.
Although this is only given as Russell's opinion, I don't think he would have published it if it wasn't the general view in the squad. Of course, CP can only publicly state "we are out to win every match".
Another point to note is that, out of our eight remaining games, four of them will be against teams with nothing to play for as regards promotion/relegation. Of course, the same applies to our rivals but, as long as we keep ratching up the points total, it doesn't matter if they gain a few more than us. Better that than eight "do-or-die" matches where the unexpected could happen.
.
Thats a good point Eddie, historically, the teams that 'have' to win at the end of the season do win - mainly because they are playing sides that are only playing for pride with nothing at stake - thats why i have us down for beating Wycombe,Preston and Hartlepool in last 3 games, mainly because Preston and Pools will have nothing to play for - and Wycombe wont have Hayes playing (i assume). I beleve we will end up 6 points clear, with Title confirmed at Preston, and Trophy collected at home to Pools on 5th May- could even see us losing at home to Pools just like we did in 91? when we lost to Pompey? after we'd rapped up the title.

stu you dont know what you are talking about mate 
Super, by more do you mean longer reports, or more posts? I write previews but don't post them on here as that seems to have become belvedere's scene. I would like to write some general articles - I had an idea for a Chris Solly one - but the amount of schoolwork is building up as GCSEs get closer.