Winter transfer window

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Fair point mate. For me, I’d rather Cannon as we can be more sure he can come in and hit the ground running, with plenty of championship experience. Rewind 12 months and I would have likely said Frigan, but given the chance we have this season, I’d take Cannon as things stand. We have a real chance of automatics here.
It's not a guarantee though, and he might struggle for gametime initially as I can't see Isidor getting dropped that quick, I'm not too sure Cannon would be happy with that...
 
I think he has a goal every 209 minutes, Cannon every 207 minutes.

This season? From what I can see, that record is consistent for Cannon across Preston, Stoke and Leicester (where he was barely used). If we signed him today and played him every week, you would be expecting 8 or 9 goals before the end of the season. That's not factoring in that we'd be creating more chances for him than any of those situations previously and that he's only 22 and has a lot of room for growth.

Last season Frigan managed a goal every 250 minutes and before that he was in an inferior league to Belgium.

I'm not for one second suggesting Frigan is a bad signing. But it's in no way a like for like but half the price. There is considerably more risk that comes with Frigan and Cannon is much more likely to provide an immediate impact.
 
This season? From what I can see, that record is consistent for Cannon across Preston, Stoke and Leicester (where he was barely used). If we signed him today and played him every week, you would be expecting 8 or 9 goals before the end of the season. That's not factoring in that we'd be creating more chances for him than any of those situations previously and that he's only 22 and has a lot of room for growth.

Last season Frigan managed a goal every 250 minutes and before that he was in an inferior league to Belgium.

I'm not for one second suggesting Frigan is a bad signing. But it's in no way a like for like but half the price. There is considerably more risk that comes with Frigan and Cannon is much more likely to provide an immediate impact.

Are we going to play him regularly though? I can’t see Isidor being dropped but £13m is a hell of a lot of money and we wouldn’t spend that on someone we expect to sit on the bench. That’s whats confusing about the whole thing for me.
 
Are we going to play him regularly though? I can’t see Isidor being dropped but £13m is a hell of a lot of money and we wouldn’t spend that on someone we expect to sit on the bench. That’s whats confusing about the whole thing for me.

I don't think anyone in our team is guaranteed to play, if someone comes in and performs better in training then isidor I'd expect them to play.
 
Sounds like the winter version of 'Mendy mkII' , the lad at Rennes?/French league 2 we courted in the summer.

There'll be a few irons in the fire.

How good is all this mate …

… whatever happens it’s going to be a great run in.

We already have enough players to beat most teams and a manager who knows how to use them.

We should be full of drink … oops, confidence going to Burnley <cheers>
 
Interestingly the season when he was top 5 in Europe for chances created, not one of them was a cross. He’ll be sliding them through all day to Isidor. If they hit it off… with the quality they’ve both got they could be pretty much unstoppable at this level.