That was my thoughts as well. So many people had our pants down back then and the club was oblivious to it.That makes absolutely grim reading. Jesus Christ.
That was my thoughts as well. So many people had our pants down back then and the club was oblivious to it.That makes absolutely grim reading. Jesus Christ.
CorrectMowbray was always a stop gap safety net after Alex neil
they just couldn’t sack him after the season he had, hence we were after the manager who went to nice
I don’t think the club have learned from their mistakes. I’d imagine this sort of thing has always been the approximate plan. It’s always been about how you start a project like this. The investment in youth and potential yields better results over time, stronger and more capable squads, higher reputation, more financial strength through sales. The truth is likely to be far more prosaic. We are capable of a deal like ELF because we can now afford it and have reached a reputation where he’d want to come.Club heave learned from their mistakes. I find that encouraging
More alarm bells for me I am afraid. Not loud ones yet, but there nevertheless. Sorry again to be the voice of caution.
What is our current top earner on? Some suggestion it is Ballard I think?
Even if the club are paying all his wages, which I would doubt, it is still only for 5 months. We are signing a luxury player to try and help with promotion which would guarantee financial rewards, to sign him. If we do not get promoted, one or both Bellingham & Rigg will depart in the summer bringing in £50 million so its a safe investment.What is it that alarms you? (Not arguing, just wanting to understand). One would assume the club can afford it as they have proven they're not the type to spent recklessly.
As said previously, Boro have done well to get that fee
You must log in or register to see media
I thought the coach recruitment was a mess in the summer. I was wrong. They did exactly what they said they would - be thorough and get the right person not just who’s available.Tbf with the whole Mowbray craic. It was clear the club wanted their own young foreign manager who properly trusted the project. It’s clear RLB is that as he worked in youth development for years and he loves working with young players. The club just simply trust him more really. It’s often mentioned how the board and manager are now a seamlessly connected team with RLB here
Correct
He did better than anyone expected.
Yeah these type of signings aren't new, they are just at a higher level because we have the financial capability to do them. In theory, in a few years time we'll move beyond the Le Fee type signings.I don’t think the club have learned from their mistakes. I’d imagine this sort of thing has always been the approximate plan. It’s always been about how you start a project like this. The investment in youth and potential yields better results over time, stronger and more capable squads, higher reputation, more financial strength through sales. The truth is likely to be far more prosaic. We are capable of a deal like ELF because we can now afford it and have reached a reputation where he’d want to come.
If we are paying his full wage now, for the next x games, that is a benchmark the club have set as what they are willing to pay for a player right now. We are no doubt mid negotiations with other first teamers on a new deal. Dan Neil, team captain, being one. Why would Dan, for example, be out of order expecting the club to offer him the same? Would the club offer him the same? Then you have agents, seeing this as opportunity to do what they do best.What is it that alarms you? (Not arguing, just wanting to understand). One would assume the club can afford it as they have proven they're not the type to spent recklessly.
If we are paying his full wage now, for the next x games, that is a benchmark the club have set as what they are willing to pay for a player right now. We are no doubt mid negotiations with other first teamers on a new deal. Dan Neil, team captain, being one. Why would Dan, for example, be out of order expecting the club to offer him the same? Would the club offer him the same? Then you have agents, seeing this as opportunity to do what they do best.
If we get promoted, and he has a pre-agreed salary, then you can expect a raft of other players demanding the same or more.
It feels like a big rod for our own back to be honest. I really hope he is worth it.
This sort of thing has caused problems for football clubs for a long time now. Man Utd are the best example of this. They have brought in players from other clubs and given them huge contracts, like Mount. Now Mainoo is up for a new contract he wants a massive bump to at least match Mount. They are unlikely to be able to do it so he could well leave. The local lad out of their academy who their fans more associate with. And who is the better player as it turns out.
I am basing all of this on the gap between Le Fees weekly wage paid for by the club and any of our other lads being significant. I read somewhere Ballard is our top earner and on around £20k. Suggestion Le Fee is on double. My experience is upset can be caused when some folk get paid significantly more than others.
I can see JC going to Leeds on loan
Think this is most likely. Key is what it means for any potential wage structure should we get promoted. It’s not surprise Neil hasn’t signed a new deal, what’s on offer to him could easily treble if we go up. On that basis I’m pretty sure they will all be happy we’ve forked out £1.5m to try and make that happenUnderstood. unless we are paying £0 of his wages directly to him and have just paid £1.5m as a loan fee to Roma, which happens to cover his wages. Which is a nuance.
We had better it's my birthdayIf he’s not getting into Ponteland until 4.30 I doubt we’ll get scarf pictures today
If he’s not getting into Ponteland until 4.30 I doubt we’ll get scarf pictures today
Might put a few on the gate if they announce he’ll be in the squad Saturday…Will be made official tomorrow morning and he'll be on the bench for Stoke, I imagine.