Lets play devils advocate for a minute.
Le Fee comes in on loan. He plays the Rigg position a lot and as a result Rigg becomes an impact player. We miss out on promotion, dont sign Le Fee. Either Riggs development has slowed, or his agent gets in his ear about a move elsewhere. We are worse off start of next season?
The problem with loans like this proposed one is they are predicated on a short term gain. In this instance a potentially better chance at promotion. The medium to longer term impacts can be more telling if we dont get promotion.
Loans have to be really carefully used imo. Particularly in Jan.
You could also that if we don’t sign Le Fee we might not go up, and he could be good enough to help us push for promotion. I don’t really know much about him tbh but I always think we should be looking to improve if we can, players development shouldn’t be a priority over promotion. It’s the same as the Clarke thing for me, I’ve seen rumours of him coming on loan and whilst I think they’re nonsense I still read into the reaction online and seeing so many of our fans say they wouldn’t have him back for the rest of the season is just bizarre to me. Our aim is promotion, not finishing 4th but giving young lads game time so their value goes up.. that’s just something we reap from the model we’re employing.
