Why are we signing two centre backs?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I know it's sounds obvious, but the business the club does over the next 2 months will define next season.

Remembering our signings during the July-Aug period in 2009 (just prior to our second season in the PL) we bought 2 Stoke rejects
in Sonko and Olafinjana. Terrible signings.

Fingers crossed our new players this time (before another second season in PL) will be of much better quality.

Not to mention 2 stoke rejects who couldn't even get in a side which spent 90% of the season in the relegation zone before a very late run of form surged them up the table.
 
It might be that Bruce senior sees Chester as a bit injury prone & needs the extra cover. Bruce junior had a stormer at Wembley & is worth keeping IMO
Signing another wing back would probably mean a 3-5-2 formation for most games so we need cover at centre back


Yep we were leading 2-1 when Bruce went off.

Have a look at Arsenal's equaliser and see who gets caught in possession which then leads to the non existent corner.....
 
I think we are aiming at two squads, a premiership squad and domestic cup squad (europa leaghe been a mix of two).

That makes perfect sense for our targets:

McGregor
Rose/bertrand (or similar), Chester, Davis, lescott/dawson, elmo

Huddlestone, Livermore,
Aluko (or snodgrass/similar)

Long, Jelavic

Cup
Jak/Harper
Dudgeon/fig, macca, Bruce, McGuire, Rosie

Meyler, Quinn
Brady

Sagbo, day (or another 4th striker)


Very happy with that as we can then play three in middle and two up top.

Will need lot of fresh legs, and still gives harper, fig, boyd as back up to fill our squad
 
Hang on how come people have views on this Maguire? When have you lot seen him play? I mean I guess he played against us but that was one game and I don'[t know about you lot but I don't remember **** all apart from the goals from that day.
 
Hang on how come people have views on this Maguire? When have you lot seen him play? I mean I guess he played against us but that was one game and I don'[t know about you lot but I don't remember **** all apart from the goals from that day.

There was a big thing about him when he made his debut, the next big thing etc. He's only 21 and has clocked up 134 appearances, that's pretty impressive.
 
One crunching tackle on that twat Fabregas and he'll be elevated to God like status! If we buy him.
 
There was a big thing about him when he made his debut, the next big thing etc. He's only 21 and has clocked up 134 appearances, that's pretty impressive.

**** that is impressive. I knew his name but nothing apart from that. Mind you it's not like Crouch's 14 goals is it? ;)
 
Hang on how come people have views on this Maguire? When have you lot seen him play? I mean I guess he played against us but that was one game and I don'[t know about you lot but I don't remember **** all apart from the goals from that day.

Which is why i asked the question. I saw Maguire quite a few times when i was banging on about Quinny a few years ago. Certainly more than Tommy I would wager.I was shocked he was so young when we played them. He may turn out to be the brilliant but he has got no pace. FACT
 
Which is why i asked the question. I saw Maguire quite a few times when i was banging on about Quinny a few years ago. Certainly more than Tommy I would wager.I was shocked he was so young when we played them. He may turn out to be the brilliant but he has got no pace. FACT

Really? How so?

The only reason I said that is that there's a thing called fitness conditioning. You aren't born with a certain pace for your whole life, you can train and get faster. It gets my goat that so many people buy into age being a massive factor in a players ability. How many people would take a 32 year old Koren over a 19 year old league one player (nobody specific)? We talk about over 30's players like they're 70; slowing down, losing their eye for goal, whatever. We're in for Amalfitano, who's 29 and there'll no doubt be people saying he's too old and will be passed it.


If it doesn't affect his game then fair enough, Chester makes up for his lack of height by being nippy and good on the ball, but if it's such a big deal then I'm sure Brucey will have him working on it in training.
 
Which is why i asked the question. I saw Maguire quite a few times when i was banging on about Quinny a few years ago. Certainly more than Tommy I would wager.I was shocked he was so young when we played them. He may turn out to be the brilliant but he has got no pace. FACT

You don't need pace if you read the game well. Having pace suggests you need it because you aren't very good at reading situations, so pace gets you off the hook.
 
I seem to recall that Brucey wasn't the fastest although I appreciate the game has changed.

OLM, you indicated that the Allams were careful with the money and would not throw it away unnecessarily, so if they're willing to stump up the 2m, there must be the budget there for it.
 
The club have now confirmed that we are interested in Harry Maguire and it looks like a £2m bid is imminent...

http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/Hull...field-United/story-21226355-detail/story.html

The Lescott offer remains on the table and will be in addition to the Maguire bid.

This would suggest that another centre back is on his way out, start praying it's Bruce.

I'm assuming that we're not cashing in on Davies, as we've today confirmed that his agent is meeting Ehab at the end of the month to agree an improved deal.

In my mind there are two possible reasons: 1) City are planning on using the Macca/McQuire partnership for their Europa Cup/ FA Cup/League Cup 'adventures'; or 2) The Allams are being true to their word as CTWD achieved their aim to retain the traditional name. They are running the club as any one else would "in their own interests now",and not in those of the community thus will therefore cashing in on the Davies assett value growth. The Lescott move then seems like a straight swap and also an astute slice of business.

Anyone looking beyond 4th from bottom next season as success? Don't ya just love the Premiership?