Whose idea was this seat move?

Or expertly handled to piss people off?

 

The execution wasn't exactly spectacular but we did actually find out this was definitely happening weeks back.

Maybe it would have been handled better if not for the FA cup run and other stuff delaying the renewals and there was time during the season to organise the move better. But that's life.

 

If you are saying you are not bad mouthing them, however indirectly, then fair enough; I'm sure you are sincere.

Do you deny the possibility that someone might have listened to the supporters, who , some, not all, have had this idea? I have highlighted the only suggestion I made, through means of a question. Why are you so defensive? Enlighten me, which other question have I answered incorrectly?

Struggling to understand your line of discussion here; do feel free to use bold, underline, even CAPS to embellish your confusing posts, as every little helps! You might even explain ' what's about right for me'?

 

Well they should be reincarnated (yes I know that's the wrong word but I'm nackered) because just look how well it works for Crystal Palace. Proper fans, proper atmosphere, we should copy them.

That means underage girls cheerleading before kick off anarl.

Get it done.

 

Where did you get the chance to 'not object' to it? Did you get the chance to point out it would possibly be unpopular with a significant number of people and that other options should/could be considered?

In my view, IF the atmosphere improves it will be in spite of, rather than because of this mess. Hence me wondering who proposed it this time round.

 

AP didn't reject it.he was told it wasn't possible by the SAG and others.

 

No one disagrees, one week to pay is simply ****e.

A reservation system would have been better.

Can I just say that I do not think that anyone in the ticket office is to blame for this. The chances are that this was just a simple error in planning that was not thought through. But if it was planned to upset E1-3, you lads are seriously ****ed.

 

You seem to imply you know who put this scheme together.

 

So he didn't go ahead based on the advice offered. Semantics.

 

And was a date given for it or some kind of timetable for selection of seats/blocks?

Too many polo matches or squash tournaments to organise?

 

'They can die as soon as they like' ?

I mean, it's not like our owner harbours any malice is it?

 

Even this week, the situation's far from clear.

 

Ah ha

 

Never mind that ****
Whose idea was this seat move?

 

Very short term for several long standing fans in our group that won't be renewing because of it. There'll be more to follow too. I doubt the replacements will be arsed to vote no to Hull Tigers.

You've got it badly wrong here OLM

 

In the renewal blurb it skirts round the fact that we only get the worse half of the north stand rather than the entire stand.

Deceit or incompetent vagueness?

Surely it would have been much better to give us all of the north stand of failing that the eastern side of the North stand?

I look forward to the uproar in N5 as away fans are outed.

 

Stop being so melodramatic you bloody queen.

Christ.