True but that was a one off, we never needed more than 4 CBs this season. Campbell was 4th choice and only made 8 appearances (2 as a sub).
well said, completely agree
True but that was a one off, we never needed more than 4 CBs this season. Campbell was 4th choice and only made 8 appearances (2 as a sub).
True but that was a one off, we never needed more than 4 CBs this season. Campbell was 4th choice and only made 8 appearances (2 as a sub).
i diddnt realise he was from kosovo, i feel bad, mr beasley is not adverse to humility, i appologise for my error
If we signed another CB then Saylor could play RB?
If we signed another CB then Saylor could play RB?
god no, sign a right back and keep him in the middleIf we signed another CB then Saylor could play RB?
I wouldnt want that, he seems to think he's Dani Alves when playing RB.

Yes, and you may want to check your own spelling and grammar if you're going to be childish enough to comment on anyone else's, if the above is anything to go by.
EDIT: re the OP, I wouldn't say no to a CB but I think we have greater priorities, as mentioned on here a number of times already.
Zapata would be a great signing, also plays RB with ease, would give alot more options at the back. Doubt he would want to come here though, but maybe if we were able to get rid of Smith/Perch and Xisco's we could tempt him with a massive wage packet. (Don't burst my bubble with the salary cap talk!)
Would much rather we just signed one more striker and one centre back/right back than two strikers.
Sorry chap but imagine the finger is the wage cap if you will and the bubble represents your dreams...
Sorry chap but imagine the finger is the wage cap if you will and the bubble represents your dreams...
You must log in or register to see images
