We don't play to our strengths in attack. That was amazingly evident against the 9-men of Sunderland, where our answer to failing crosses was to cross the ball more, and then put more strikers on.
Rather than trying to cross more, or put more strikers in the box - we should be questioning the crossing itself.
We can pass the ball well, let's try passing. It has to be better than Huddlestone floating in another 'cross' from deep.
I think we probably have more chances against Liverpool next week, because we don't have to break them down, if we get a chance it will probably be on the counter. Once we have possession and have to think about having to score, we just end up throwing aimless crosses in and wondering why we don't score.
This is pretty much it. Today was a reality check though. We aren't much better than Palace are (who aren't as bad as their position suggests by the way) and we certainly aren't a mid-table side in this division. We'll compete for the rest of the season I'm sure but I think we're in a false position. The game was **** and they came to sit back but as the home team it's our responsibility to break them down and make a game of it. We can't do that. The last two home games have shown we really struggle when a team has men behind the ball. We can't get behind the midfield never mind the defence. Fair play to Palace they got behind us once and scored the only real chance they had. We had one real chance and missed it with Sagbo but I don't blame him, it took ages for the ball to get in front of him and then Speroni was immediately on top of him.
I can't explain what happens with our crossing though. We put loads of balls in and some of them are good quality. One Boyd corner in the second half in particular was a perfect ball and everyone missed it. I just don'[t understand why the strikers can't get near the crosses.