US Election

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Who will win?..


  • Total voters
    60
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don’t know. I’m not involved in the case.

According to what Guiliani says, it’s a fraction of all the evidence they have.

We’re going to find out if that’s the case.

Guiliani is your sort of guy that would walk into a Denny's and order his eggs over easy, and if they arrived sunnyside up, he'd claim a conspirarcy. He's the sort guy that'll have a 10% coupon, pronounced kyoo-pon and he'd still claim he was mugged when he gave only his discount as a tip.
 
Millions were sent to people that didn’t want them. So said millions crossed a box, signed it and sent it back?

if I was sent something I don’t want, I throw it away...

He’s just got home and seen thousands of people celebrating him being defeated outside the front lawn, he’s fuming <laugh>

Love the way Twitter are now labelling all of his lies.
 
If it was a record number of votes cast, wouldn't it have been easier to bin off some of Trump's votes and nobody would've been none the wiser as the numbers would've still stacked.

I'm sure trying to bin off votes isn't the easiest thing to do but in the world of delusion and conspiracies, it's a damned sight easier than coming up with some convoluted plot to try and enter bogus ballots through countless processes involving all sorts of observers and checks.
 
If it was a record number of votes cast, wouldn't it have been easier to bin off some of Trump's votes and nobody would've been none the wiser as the numbers would've still stacked.

I'm sure trying to bin off votes isn't the easiest thing to do but in the world of delusion and conspiracies, it's a damned sight easier than coming up with some convoluted plot to try and enter bogus ballots through countless processes involving all sorts of observers and checks.
And if it was true wouldn't so called bogus votes be for both parties ?
Why do Trump supporters always come across as Redneck thick twats ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Treble
OT but.. war machine funded fake open source garbage Bellingcat who fooled UK into bombing Syria forced to cop it by Peter Hitchens who has for almost a year taken reams of **** for sticking his neck out to tell the truth

Doing that can even get you killed, he's a **** but a brave ****

Bellingcat bullshit helped build bogus OPCW chemical attack report blaming Assad UK launching Cruise missiles at Syria (UK Gov officials even promoted Bellingcat on the news last year)
You must log in or register to see images

You must log in or register to see images



Bravo Peter Hitchens, only him and Robert Fisk out of the whole UK media, including BBC, told the truth on the cooked up report

I just had a search on BBC, almost a year and still nothing
You must log in or register to see images

You must log in or register to see images


BBC still has the propaganda up. BBC has been doing this for decades (the chlorine detected was from wood, wood that was treated with chloring as part of its manufacturing process (OPCW left that bit out) and their engineers who blew the whistle said the report was bullshit.
Nothing about the report being ripped apart and shown to be a fraud
You must log in or register to see images


Of course been saying this for a decade, BBC is a war propaganda machine, a very effective one
 
Last edited:
And if it was true wouldn't so called bogus votes be for both parties ?
Why do Trump supporters always come across as Redneck thick twats ?

There is absolutely zero credibility to any coordinated or deliberate conspiracy by Biden campaign or supporters.

The most they can come up with is about 3000 votes which came in postmarked after election day in Pennsylvania which the Secretary of State stated would be counted and sealed separately but not included in the official numbers. So what does Trump do? Gets a Supreme Court ruling telling them to do exactly what they were doing anyway. And after all that, it was only 3,000 votes which weren't included and would've made no difference to the result even if they had.

If Trump pursues this madness, he's going to get slapped down. And I'll go as far as to say, by the very Supreme Court Judges he appointed, because even they aren't that deluded!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.