Evidence ?I assure you the entire rest of the thread is credible.
Evidence ?I assure you the entire rest of the thread is credible.
That's a claim, not evidence.
Congratulations mean nothing. So what if BoJo has congratulated him? He’s a man who hid in a fridge to avoid a journalist; I trust nothing that weasel does or says.
As regards your allegations that there is no evidence of polling irregularities, on what basis do you say that with any conviction? Have you sat as a judge at the preliminary hearing that no one knows about, and hear legal arguments?
I suspect not. In which case, the wise thing to do is await the outcome of the legal challenge.
So you've seen no evidence, yet you believe a challenge is warranted? Sounds about right.Indeed.
As I said, they’re not going to present their evidence to the media as it could compromise their challenge.
But I have heard enough to believe that a legal challenge is warranted. Anyone who states, with any attempt at authority that there is no evidence is also doing nothing more than making a claim.
Just start on page one and go from there.
Life is too shortJust start on page one and go from there.
So you've seen no evidence, yet you believe a challenge is warranted? Sounds about right.

I've made no allegations ... but I have stated a fact ... no evidence was produced during the vote counting process ...

How would you know?
Guiliani claims that he has affidavits from 40 pollsters that there were serious irregularities.
They’re not going to present that evidence to the media before the court hearing as it would most definitely jeopardise their case.
For you to assert that there is no evidence is manifestly incorrect.

Yeah, it's all on Hunter Biden's laptop.How would you know?
Guiliani claims that he has affidavits from 40 pollsters that there were serious irregularities.
They’re not going to present that evidence to the media before the court hearing as it would most definitely jeopardise their case.
For you to assert that there is no evidence is manifestly incorrect.
I prefer to wait for the evidence to be put forward and heard before jumping to any conclusions.
Hunter Biden, who daddy made him take drugs and put him harms way with criminals...Yeah, it's all on Hunter Biden's laptop.
So you've seen no evidence, yet you believe a challenge is warranted? Sounds about right.
Are you being obtuse on purpose?
There is clearly evidence to put before the court. How strong that evidence is will be for the Supreme Court to determine.
To state that there is no evidence is so clearly wrong as to encourage me that you are wilfully yanking my chain.
I haven't stated that there's no evidence. I've said that he hasn't produced any.Are you being obtuse on purpose?
There is clearly evidence to put before the court. How strong that evidence is will be for the Supreme Court to determine.
To state that there is no evidence is so clearly wrong as to encourage me that you are wilfully yanking my chain.
I'm sure they can fabricate some false evidence .So you've seen no evidence, yet you believe a challenge is warranted? Sounds about right.

Yeah, it's all on Hunter Biden's laptop.
How would you know?
Guiliani claims that he has affidavits from 40 pollsters that there were serious irregularities.
They’re not going to present that evidence to the media before the court hearing as it would most definitely jeopardise their case.
For you to assert that there is no evidence is manifestly incorrect.