US Election

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Who will win?..

  • Total voters
    60
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hoddle is a god said:
That evidence, so I understand, corroborates evidence already in the public arena of Biden’s corruption.

Anyway, what has that got to do with poll rigging in Pennsylvania and other States?

I don’t see the relevance.
Click to expand...
What poll rigging is this?
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
I haven't stated that there's no evidence. I've said that he hasn't produced any.
You're claiming that there's clearly evidence to put before the court. You can't possibly know this, as you admit to not having seen any.
Obtuse? Yep.
Click to expand...


<doh>
Oh ffs!

Please read what I have written, as I refuse to keep repeating myself.
 
Tobes said:
What poll rigging is this?
Click to expand...
It’s ****ing laughable! Like said previously, there will be a few votes that are fraudulent on both sides that fall through. To rig a vote of this size in quite a transparent election in a democracy is nigh on impossible. It would need to have 100s, if not 1000s of people in on it.

Therefore, if you believe this has happened, you need sectioned for your own good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tobes
brb said:
Is that it <laugh>
Click to expand...


I don’t know. I’m not involved in the case.

According to what Guiliani says, it’s a fraction of all the evidence they have.

We’re going to find out if that’s the case.
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
I have. He's produced no evidence and made false claims.
There were no Republican election observers in Pennsylvania? Trump's own lawyers say that's wrong.
They sued for access and already had it. That's according to that radical left-wing publication, The Daily Mail:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ers-banned-polls-lawyers-admitted-let-in.html
Click to expand...


And Guiliani is asserting that he has evidence that that’s bollocks.

Let us wait for this evidence to be tested in court.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FosseFilberto
brb said:
Is that it <laugh>
Click to expand...
Who were the Republican observers and all Guiliani put forward was that the admin of the counting centre moved some tables.

This is what happens when you have a president who has told circa 25k demonstrable lies during his 4 year term.

As whilst he was POTUS he could just ignore reality being pointed out to him, and then double down on his lies. Only now, his lies need to stand up in a court of law, and the reality is, that they’ll have zero proof of a coordinated fraud that resulted in him losing the election, so his lies are about to collide with reality, and no amount of bluster and bullshit is going to make any difference. He lost the election as his opponent will end up getting circa 5m more votes than him - that’s literally it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobbyD, brb and Bald Archie
Hoddle is a god said:
I don’t know. I’m not involved in the case.

According to what Guiliani says, it’s a fraction of all the evidence they have.

We’re going to find out if that’s the case.
Click to expand...

Whatever the next big world event is, you're going to take the minority position, against the vast majority of everyone on here, regardless of your view on it, aren't you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: pieguts and brb
pompeymeowth said:
Whatever the next big world event is, you're going to take the minority position, against the vast majority of everyone on here, regardless of your view on it, aren't you?
Click to expand...
Wouldn’t be surprised if HIAG was a Holocaust denier and Nazi sympathiser!

Probably a good thing Hitler didn’t have a Twitter account.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back