US Election

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Who will win?..

  • Total voters
    60
Status
Not open for further replies.
Big Ern said:
'Release the Kraken' lawyer is in court getting sued by the voting machine company, her defence is "no reasonable person should have believed me."

lol.

Trump also getting sued
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/do...sue-trump-giuliani-over-capitol-riot-n1258009
Click to expand...

This is the same defence both Tucker Carlson and Alex Jones have used in court as well. Yet the gammon twats on GC (late of this parish) quote the ****ers and retweet their bile again and again. Then again, reasonable people....
 
Special Patrol Group said:
This is the same defence both Tucker Carlson and Alex Jones have used in court as well. Yet the gammon twats on GC (late of this parish) quote the ****ers and retweet their bile again and again. Then again, reasonable people....
Click to expand...
They should go for every channel and host with 'news' in it's title that promoted the lie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PleaseNotPoll and Ivan Dobsky
Special Patrol Group said:
This is the same defence both Tucker Carlson and Alex Jones have used in court as well. Yet the gammon twats on GC (late of this parish) quote the ****ers and retweet their bile again and again. Then again, reasonable people....
Click to expand...
I don't get how she can even try this. She's not a ranting TV presenter, she's a lawyer and she brought court cases forward on it.
I think it's a stupid defence anyway, as neither Jones nor Carlson present their schtick as comedy, but I fail to see how it could apply to her at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ivan Dobsky
PleaseNotPoll said:
I don't get how she can even try this. She's not a ranting TV presenter, she's a lawyer and she brought court cases forward on it.
I think it's a stupid defence anyway, as neither Jones nor Carlson present their schtick as comedy, but I fail to see how it could apply to her at all.
Click to expand...

Her argument is that it's for the courts to decide the veracity of it - bringing it to the court in the first place is not an offence. Okay, but even after the cases had been dismissed she continued to spout it. She'll go to the SC with this on a first amendment pitch, sponsored by the MAGAloons, I'm telling you. Note though that Guilliani was careful NOT to make the Dominion allegations in his cases. He even went so far as to turn up for some hearings just to answer 'None' when asked what evidence he had of fraud, knowing he couldn't be disbarred for that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Ern and PleaseNotPoll
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back