US Election

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Who will win?..

  • Total voters
    60
Status
Not open for further replies.
brb said:
Good idea, I should apply to be a social media regulator, that will go down well with @Archers Road <whistle>

I'd bin Starmer off in my first week, actually i'd probably bin every politician off.
Click to expand...
It's their own platform though, not Social Media. The twat could start Trumper himself and he'd have millions of idiots lining up to join.
Edit: Why the **** did I put that suggestion out there? <doh> ****'s sake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
PleaseNotPoll said:
It's their own platform though, not Social Media. The twat could start Trumper himself and he'd have millions of idiots lining up to join.
Edit: Why the **** did I put that suggestion out there? <doh> ****'s sake.
Click to expand...

No that's not a a good name, sounds like someone constantly farting........ah yeah, get you now bruv :cheesy:
 
  • Like
Reactions: PleaseNotPoll
PleaseNotPoll said:
I haven't read the whole of the thread yet, so I'll apologise in advance if this had already been said or covered.

This is social media. It's a public forum.
This is regulated. You bloody regulate it! <laugh> So do I, to some extent.
When you banned Matth, for example, you didn't silence him or take away his freedom of speech.
He moved to other platforms. Trump has a press briefing room in his ****ing house!

Even somewhere like this place has rules that you can't break.
He did it on twatter for years and got away with it because of who he was.
They've banned tons of people before for far, far less. Why should he be immune to it?

Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences from what you say.
Post porn on here and you'll get booted. That's not oppression.
Click to expand...

Never follow Twitter much, so never saw Matth on there. What did he get away with? :bandit:
 
Forbes McAllister said:
?
Click to expand...

No more joint top, we're shaking you off our coat tails tonight <diva>

Get ready for Matth going full twatteroid. I'll be posting links later.


























^^^^^^ this will not be coming baack to bite me on the arse later no siree. I'll still be posting Matth's twatter though - it'll be funny as fck either way tbf
 
Treble said:
No more joint top, we're shaking you off our coat tails tonight <diva>

Get ready for Matth going full twatteroid. I'll be posting links later.

Oh. 'Joint top'. When did that happen? Don't remember up being joint top with Spurs when we were level on ponts with them. Or Everton. In fact, any of the teams who've been top for two minutes this season. :emoticon-0143-smirk


























^^^^^^ this will not be coming baack to bite me on the arse later no siree. I'll still be posting Matth's twatter though - it'll be funny as fck either way tbf
Click to expand...
 
This twat's been arrested:
You must log in or register to see images


He decided it would be a good idea to attend a riot that was being televised, while he was out on bail pending a drug dealing trial. <doh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peej and Tobes
The US executed the only woman on death row yesterday, in Indiana ... not sure whether this comes down to Trump's last confused attempt to demonstrate that he is the President of Law and Order or whether it sits solely with the Supreme Court ...

No real argument that she was batshit mental... strangled a heavily pregnant woman, cut out her baby (then tried to claim it was her own) leaving the young woman to bleed to death.

Turns out she was abused by her own father as a kid and also traded to other men by him - defence argued she was not capable of rational thought at her trial.

Last minute appeal for a stay of execution on similar grounds was rejected.

Dead girl's family said she deserved death penalty for such an evil act, even if she was deranged. Can understand how they feel - but this is supposedly the world's most forward thinking, civilised, nation.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: brb
FosseFilberto said:
The US executed the only woman on death row yesterday, in Indiana ... not sure whether this comes down to Trump's last confused attempt to demonstrate that he is the President of Law and Order or whether it sits solely with the Supreme Court ...

No real argument that she was batshit mental... strangled a heavily pregnant woman, cut out her baby (then tried to claim it was her own) leaving the young woman to bleed to death.

Turns out she was abused by her own father as a kid and also traded to other men by him - defence argued she was not capable of rational thought at her trial.

Last minute appeal for a stay of execution on similar grounds was rejected.

Girl's family said she deserved death penalty for such an evil act, even if she was deranged. Can understand how they feel - but this is supposedly the world's mist forward thinking, civilised, nation.
Click to expand...

It a horrendous story both in her upbringing and the murder. She was so obviously mentally ill and didn’t justify the death penalty even by US standards. Whole thing is just grim.
 
FosseFilberto said:
The US executed the only woman on death row yesterday, in Indiana ... not sure whether this comes down to Trump's last confused attempt to demonstrate that he is the President of Law and Order or whether it sits solely with the Supreme Court ...

No real argument that she was batshit mental... strangled a heavily pregnant woman, cut out her baby (then tried to claim it was her own) leaving the young woman to bleed to death.

Turns out she was abused by her own father as a kid and also traded to other men by him - defence argued she was not capable of rational thought at her trial.

Last minute appeal for a stay of execution on similar grounds was rejected.

Dead girl's family said she deserved death penalty for such an evil act, even if she was deranged. Can understand how they feel - but this is supposedly the world's most forward thinking, civilised, nation.
Click to expand...

I suppose another way of looking at it, is that the executed woman will be at peace now. Something those in the legal profession wouldn't understand, because they are probably so bloody god righteous they probably think she will go to hell. Whereas her hell was in the act that she commited and that which she bestowed on her victim. Keeping her a live might actually have been the greater punishment, retaining her hell, locked up inside until her dying day. When asked if she had anything to say, she said 'no' - which probably meant her soul was already dead and she really didn't care her life was about to cease.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FosseFilberto
brb said:
I suppose another way of looking at it, is that the executed woman will be at peace now. Something those in the legal profession wouldn't understand, because they are probably so bloody god righteous they probably think she will go to hell. Whereas her hell was in the act that she commited and that which she bestowed on her victim. Keeping her a live might actually have been the greater punishment, retaining her hell, locked up inside until her dying day. When asked if she had anything to say, she said 'no' - which probably meant her soul was already dead and she really didn't care her life was about to cease.
Click to expand...

Americans are always banging on, about how great America is, but I rarely see anything to support this theory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back