The FBI have warned that:
Armed protests have been arranged, at all 50 state Capitols.
Threats against Biden, Harris and Pelosi.
An uprising will take place, should Trump be removed.
Fascism is alive and well in the US.
(That last part was me)
Only saw a couple of them, not sure why i missed the rest, great cast thoughHome of Stella Street too.
You must log in or register to see media

Home of Stella Street too.
You must log in or register to see media

Only saw a couple of them, not sure why i missed the rest, great cast though![]()
The FBI have warned that:
Armed protests have been arranged, at all 50 state Capitols.
Threats against Biden, Harris and Pelosi.
An uprising will take place, should Trump be removed.
Fascism is alive and well in the US.
(That last part was me)

What about fervent Trump supporters, that serve in the military. Who's to say they won't side with the protesters and shoot up the joint.
After what happened the other day, anything could be possible.
See if people put moderate views into it, I'm happy. Just keep this quiet from Archers ffs, I don't need a headache.
Nah, most of them are sackless incels chatting **** on the net.What about fervent Trump supporters, that serve in the military. Who's to say they won't side with the protesters and shoot up the joint.
After what happened the other day, anything could be possible.

The prime issue with Ofcom is that it’s largely reactive. So it investigates supposed issues that have been brought to its attention. For example, 24,500 complained about a ****ing dance routine on ITV recently ffs, so they investigated and found it was a dance troupe...dancing.It's a double edged sword. Ofcom's rules on impartiality mean that media have to offer differing views, so you'll get the bobble heads chatting **** for 'balance', but there's nothing in their rules that states that media outlets have to give equal coverage to opposing views.
This will be the angle that channels like GB News and News UK TV will use to get their licences. They will be heavily right leaning, with the lightest nod to an counter view.
The Sisters of MAGA
You must log in or register to see images
No words, I’m done.
The order of Our Lady of Fashima.Masonic Nazi Nuns?
The prime issue with Ofcom is that it’s largely reactive. So it investigates supposed issues that have been brought to its attention. For example, 24,500 complained about a ****ing dance routine on ITV recently ffs, so they investigated and found it was a dance troupe...dancing.
So whilst you say there’s no requirement for obvious ‘balance’ the viewing snowflakes make that decision knowing that if they get a decent ‘ratio’ it’ll cause the broadcaster some grief.
The current predictable freeze peach debates in the wake of Trump being rightly removed from Twitter sum up the problem perfectly. He used that platform to spout over 20,000 demonstrable lies in 4 years of office, the culmination of which was a direct attack on the heart US democracy by falsely accusing anyone and everyone of being involved in ‘stealing the election’, then when completely cornered and out of options, he orchestrated that shameful debacle last week, resulting in a handful of deaths, but it could have been far, far worse.
He was left unchallenged for way too long, it was only post the election that they started tagging his lies with warnings about the veracity of the content. So there’s the issue, what does free speech actually look like in the age of social media? Should people be able to post demonstrable untruths without censure? Where does opinion end and deliberate and potentially dangerous misinformation begin?
Recent debates on the subject have been clouded by people taking entrenched viewpoints based on who’s being discussed and the colour of their scarf. This issue isn’t black and white, it’s a vast number of shades of grey, but we appear to have lost the ability to have nuanced positions these days, it’s all about the team you’ve chosen.
The entire issue does need debate, as something has to change imo, but I don’t profess to have all the answers as to what that looks like. A cross party committee in the commons might be a decent starting point for us.
The Sisters of MAGA
You must log in or register to see images
No words, I’m done.
Ofcom sets out some broad parameters for impartiality and standards in order for UK media to gain their licence to broadcast, but as you say it’s problematic as they are largely reactive when it comes to dealing with problems, and it’s often a case of shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted. And at times they are shutting the wrong door and letting the wrong horse bolt off.
As for social media, you can see why they have attempted to allow their platforms to be as free and open as possible, otherwise they get accused censorship and partisanship, when they are attempting to be apolitical.
That said, look at what it’s led to; an actual coup attempt in the heart of US govt, fuelled by years of lies and abuse from the sitting President.
Nobody wants a China style ban on Facebook and Twitter and it replaced with a Govt sanctioned version, but it looks like there’s got to be either better self regulation of these platforms or tighter legislation. Tbf to Twitter and Facebook they have at least made a start on that now.
The problem for me is that fake meat is always mince, particularly the red meat. You won't find a whole piece or pieces of fake meat. Even fckin steaks
Using a chicken analogy, everything is nugget not fillet.
The Sisters of MAGA
You must log in or register to see images
No words, I’m done.