US Election

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Who will win?..


  • Total voters
    60
Status
Not open for further replies.
This is a superb summary of how things currently stand with American democracy...

You must log in or register to see media

I listened to 90 seconds of hypocrisy from a reporter and channel that does none of the things he was crowing about, and decided to turn it off. Sorry bro.
 
I listened to 90 seconds of hypocrisy from a reporter and channel that does none of the things he was crowing about, and decided to turn it off. Sorry bro.


Ironically, it is people with your mentality that Tucker is aiming his most barbed comments at.

You don't know the truth, because you don't want to hear it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ivan Dobsky
This is how fascism starts. Trump’s still very slender hope, is that he has planted enough of his partisan yes-men and women in key legal positions, to enable him to undermine those offices of state that are designed protect democracy.

We’re already seeing Attorney General William Barr, and GSA administrator Emily Murphy, both Trump appointments, breaking with protocol in ways that suggest outright partisanship and disregard for the responsibilities of the offices to which they were appointed.

Trump will stop at literally nothing to overturn this election, and any decision in court or elsewhere, that goes against him. He’s going to push the US Constitution to it’s limits, and he’ll burn down the house before goes quietly. And don’t forget he has been enabled by willing collaboraters throughout his Presidency - he’s not alone in this.


I don’t think Barr will be played, but follow up and cases where fraud can be proven-if any. Why have your office chase cases it will lose.
 
Ironically, it is people with your mentality that Tucker is aiming his most barbed comments at.

You don't know the truth, because you don't want to hear it.

You clearly didn't understand what I said. People like Tucker and channels like Fox News have spent a lifetime going against the very things he's crowing about in that report. Now he's preaching to those who have spent decades pulling them up on it. THAT'S the real irony.

That second line sounded better when Jack Nicholson used it in A Few Good Men <ok>
 
You clearly didn't understand what I said. People like Tucker and channels like Fox News have spent a lifetime going against the very things he's crowing about in that report. Now he's preaching to those who have spent decades pulling them up on it. THAT'S the real irony.

That second line sounded better when Jack Nicholson used it in A Few Good Men <ok>


Have you watched the video?

Again, as with PNP, I strongly suspect not, as you've jumped on my post within seconds.

Please, do not bother to reply to my posts, as you clearly are too immature to debate anything in a reasonable, sensible manner.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
Did you watch the video?

I suspect not, as it's 23 minutes long, and you've jumped on your (clearly unbiased) response within seconds.

Listen to what he has to say, and tell me where he is wrong.
Why would I listen to something that the sources itself says not to take seriously in a court case?
It's not news. They've worked hard to make sure that it's not seen as news or they'd be held responsible for it legally.
It's propaganda for the simple. They admit it and people still won't accept it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Treble
Why would I listen to something that the sources itself says not to take seriously in a court case?


If you posted something and told me to watch it as it might alter my view, this is what I would do...

I would watch it, and then I would give you a critique of what I heard. I would do this (a) because I am a fair, and intelligent person, (b) to show you that I had, in fact, paid you the courtesy of watching something that you believe might inform me on arguments that you feel I might be persuaded to take an alternative or differing view, (c) to go provide you with an insight into my arguments against you, and thereby give me the chance to know whether or not I am someone who is worth your while engaging with, or a complete and utter waste of space.

What I would not do is what you have done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
Have you watched the video?

Again, as with PNP, I strongly suspect not, as you've jumped on my post with seconds.

Please, do not bother to reply to my posts, as you clearly are too immature to debate anything is a reasonable, sensible manner.


Do you have a problem with reading? <laugh>

I already posted I watched 90 seconds and gave my reasons for switching it off which you commented on without understanding them.

LOL at that last sentence. What is it about you, Sisu and Saxton that you can't handle anyone disagreeing with you and then try to shut down debate?
 
It's called 'Rhetorical hyperbole', Alex Jones' defence when he was eventually called to account over his disgusting Sandy hook slurs against the parents of the murdered children.
Exactly. Jones and Carlson don't believe that this **** is true, but their followers do. Dangerous arseholes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ivan Dobsky
If you posted something and told me to watch it as it might alter my view, this is what I would do...

I would watch it, and then I would give you a critique of what I heard. I would do this (a) because I am a fair, and intelligent person, (b) to show you that I had, in fact, paid you the courtesy of watching something that you believe might inform me on arguments that you feel I might be persuaded to take an alternative or differing view, (c) to go provide you with an insight into my arguments against you, and thereby give me the chance to know whether or not I am someone who is worth your while engaging with, or a complete and utter waste of space.

What I would not do is what you have done.
Why would I watch something that the person featured in it has admitted isn't true? That would be a waste of time.
 
Tucker can get ****ed. He is just a bullshit trumpet as far as I am concerned.
Will he comment on his own network shutting off the press conference/update last night on allegations of voter fraud?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ivan Dobsky
I don’t think Barr will be played, but follow up and cases where fraud can be proven-if any. Why have your office chase cases it will lose.

My view is that the FBI is getting involved early on into this because it knows full well that (a) fraud has occurred on a massive scale to the extent that it simply cannot be hidden, and (b) it knows full well that there is a good chance that the Supreme Court will vote in favour of Trump, and it doesn't want to be seen as being behind the curve should Trump be declare the victor, at a time when it has been dragging its heels on the Biden bribery scandal.
 
Why would I watch something that the person featured in it has admitted isn't true? That would be a waste of time.


So, you're saying that that video that Fox released only today, does not represent what Tucker actually believes?

Please provide me with evidence that Tucker or anyone from Fox said that what Tucker says in that video is not what he honestly believes.

To be clear, I'm not interested in what Fox may or may not have said about anything else that Tucker may or may not have said about anything else in the past.

I will wait.
 
My view is that the FBI is getting involved early on into this because it knows full well that (a) fraud has occurred on a massive scale to the extent that it simply cannot be hidden, and (b) it knows full well that there is a good chance that the Supreme Court will vote in favour of Trump, and it doesn't want to be seen as being behind the curve should Trump be declare the victor, at a time when it has been dragging its heels on the Biden bribery scandal.


The FBI will have to be involved to look at the submissions from people to its offices locally of suspected Voter fraud. It’s funny that will voter fraud be looked at in states where republicans win/won?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ivan Dobsky
Exactly. Jones and Carlson don't believe that this **** is true, but their followers do. Dangerous arseholes.

I watched Carlson on Thursday night as I was amused at watching Fox meltdowns. He was rolling out the usual turd pie about how Trump and Sanders (God, how they wish they'd faced Bernie and not Biden) were true politicians, not owned by billionaires and power-hungry oligarchs like, er, Biden. As I said at the time, who is it who owns the Fox Network that he works for? :emoticon-0112-wonde
 
  • Like
Reactions: PleaseNotPoll
Called that a few weeks ago over Barrett, and also said Kavanaugh will be on his strings too. People were focusing on Trump trying to force through a SC judge against precedent before the election, and the ACA (being heard today), and issues such as abortion. But it was never about that- it was always about this moment, and she will pay up her exclusive joining fees, be of no doubt.

But all this said, here is the worse case scenario - they can throw that much **** that the electoral college could overturn the delegates they send to the ratification next month, but this then has to be agreed by both houses. Even if the Republican senate members are shameless and partisan to pass it, the congress will not. It is then decided by the Democratic governor of Pennsylvannia: game over.

Trump probably doesn't know this - Barr most certainly does. All senior Republicans are now positioning themselves for 2024, even the decent ones like Nikki Hayley. Nobody, even Murdoch The Kingmaker, wants to upset the MAGAhideen - they're needed for what's to come.


MAGAhideen <laugh>

Otherwise known at the Trump Taliban. How the **** did this happen to the USA? It's worryingly full of these brainwashed ****** redneck conspiracy theorists. Not that this phenomonon is confined to the States.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.