US Election

I listened to 90 seconds of hypocrisy from a reporter and channel that does none of the things he was crowing about, and decided to turn it off. Sorry bro.

 

Ironically, it is people with your mentality that Tucker is aiming his most barbed comments at.

You don't know the truth, because you don't want to hear it.

 

Fox told a court that no reasonable person would take Tucker Carlson seriously, as clearly wasn't telling the truth but selling a narrative:
https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/9177...s-tucker-carlson-tells-you-so-say-fox-s-lawye

 

I don’t think Barr will be played, but follow up and cases where fraud can be proven-if any. Why have your office chase cases it will lose.

 

You clearly didn't understand what I said. People like Tucker and channels like Fox News have spent a lifetime going against the very things he's crowing about in that report. Now he's preaching to those who have spent decades pulling them up on it. THAT'S the real irony.

That second line sounded better when Jack Nicholson used it in A Few Good Men

 

Did you watch the video?

I suspect not, as it's 23 minutes long, and you've jumped on your (clearly unbiased) response within seconds.

Listen to what he has to say, and tell me where he is wrong.

 

Have you watched the video?

Again, as with PNP, I strongly suspect not, as you've jumped on my post within seconds.

Please, do not bother to reply to my posts, as you clearly are too immature to debate anything in a reasonable, sensible manner.

 

Why would I listen to something that the sources itself says not to take seriously in a court case?
It's not news. They've worked hard to make sure that it's not seen as news or they'd be held responsible for it legally.
It's propaganda for the simple. They admit it and people still won't accept it.

 

Because it can be used to sell a narrative. They don't have to win, they just have to convince people that they're right.

 

It's called 'Rhetorical hyperbole', Alex Jones' defence when he was eventually called to account over his disgusting Sandy hook slurs against the parents of the murdered children.

 

If you posted something and told me to watch it as it might alter my view, this is what I would do...

I would watch it, and then I would give you a critique of what I heard. I would do this (a) because I am a fair, and intelligent person, (b) to show you that I had, in fact, paid you the courtesy of watching something that you believe might inform me on arguments that you feel I might be persuaded to take an alternative or differing view, (c) to go provide you with an insight into my arguments against you, and thereby give me the chance to know whether or not I am someone who is worth your while engaging with, or a complete and utter waste of space.

What I would not do is what you have done.

 

Do you have a problem with reading?

I already posted I watched 90 seconds and gave my reasons for switching it off which you commented on without understanding them.

LOL at that last sentence. What is it about you, Sisu and Saxton that you can't handle anyone disagreeing with you and then try to shut down debate?

 

Exactly. Jones and Carlson don't believe that this **** is true, but their followers do. Dangerous arseholes.

 

Why would I watch something that the person featured in it has admitted isn't true? That would be a waste of time.

 

Tucker can get ****ed. He is just a bullshit trumpet as far as I am concerned.
Will he comment on his own network shutting off the press conference/update last night on allegations of voter fraud?

 

My view is that the FBI is getting involved early on into this because it knows full well that (a) fraud has occurred on a massive scale to the extent that it simply cannot be hidden, and (b) it knows full well that there is a good chance that the Supreme Court will vote in favour of Trump, and it doesn't want to be seen as being behind the curve should Trump be declare the victor, at a time when it has been dragging its heels on the Biden bribery scandal.

 

So, you're saying that that video that Fox released only today, does not represent what Tucker actually believes?

Please provide me with evidence that Tucker or anyone from Fox said that what Tucker says in that video is not what he honestly believes.

To be clear, I'm not interested in what Fox may or may not have said about anything else that Tucker may or may not have said about anything else in the past.

I will wait.

 

The FBI will have to be involved to look at the submissions from people to its offices locally of suspected Voter fraud. It’s funny that will voter fraud be looked at in states where republicans win/won?

 

I watched Carlson on Thursday night as I was amused at watching Fox meltdowns. He was rolling out the usual turd pie about how Trump and Sanders (God, how they wish they'd faced Bernie and not Biden) were true politicians, not owned by billionaires and power-hungry oligarchs like, er, Biden. As I said at the time, who is it who owns the Fox Network that he works for?

 

MAGAhideen

Otherwise known at the Trump Taliban. How the **** did this happen to the USA? It's worryingly full of these brainwashed ****** redneck conspiracy theorists. Not that this phenomonon is confined to the States.