The biggest question is why his statue had not been pulled down earlier (by 'usual' means of course). The slave trade was abolished nearly a century before the statue even went up.
what people need to understand is the slave trade was only a part of his "small and short part of his empire" it is OK trying to take/hide or wish it never happened …. lets go back to say 1679 when he was a very successful bona fide merchant his trading at the time had helped to put Bristol, he was probably one of the main purveyors of the growth of the port on the map as a major trading port trading cloth, oil [ olive ?], wine, sherry and fruit with Spain, Portugal, Italy and Africa [ gold silver ivory ]
He joined the Royal African company in 1680 [ a company that held the monopoly of trading along the west Africa coast since 1660 or thereabouts] ...the trade was multi functional of which unfortunately slaves were part of it …. He had amassed quite a fortune before then [1680 ]
the consensus is slavery [ involved 12 years ] was only a small part of his wealth as he had many other lucrative strings to his bow.... the almshouses were built the year [ or after ] he left the Royal Africa Compnay. Colstons school founded over 20 years after the slave trading part of his empire ceased … he left endowment legacies in a number of institutions [ a dozen?] in Bristol. [ still running today! ]
COLSTON is what you make of him …..David
Hughson writing in 1808 described Colston as "the great benefactor of the city of Bristol, who, in his lifetime, expended more than 70,000L. [£] in charitable institutions".
HISTORY leaves its mark, it is what happened and no one can erase it … we learn by having the reminder that " this or that ???
memorial ??? represents good or bad ". Destroying or defacing" ADDS only another page of history and highlights that the perpetrator of such an act is akin to the reason the memorial may be there in the first place.