whilst i agree with the general point regarding the contribution of the USSR to the defeat of the Axis forces it is almost impossible to exactly attribute the contributions of the various nations i.e. the point about the UK contribution is we didn't surrender therefore not only tying down Axis forces but more importantly in the long run not handing over control of our industry & resources and without the huge supplies ,mainly from USA, that USSR rec'd from 1943 onwards of wheat & spam to White half tracks difficult to see how they could have carried out operations like Bagration so probably best to say the USA & USSR "won" the second world war the Yanks with industry & technology the USSR with blood.
The point about propaganda holds true for 1945 by the way as certainly here there was a successful propaganda campaign designed to portray the Bolshevik regime in a positive light.
Tbh is 80% of axis forces were deployed on eastern front that tells you a huge amount.
The aerial was was western allies. Strategic bombing was theirs for sure.
The war imo was clear. By 1943 post kursk battle Germany was beaten...by Russia.
If the western allies never landed in Normandy imo the Germans would have been beaten by Russia alone.
Imo Greece and Yugoslavia was critical in 1941. Had Italy any competence or had Greece been ignored and Russia had been attacked 6/8 weeks earlier imo Moscow may gave fallen...
However for me the point has to be the story told in the West thrown popular culture. The real history is rarely discussed. The Americans are indeed accredited with winning WWii just about on their own and it's through how the story is told in movies and even documentaries.
We focus on d-day and the battle of Britain, perhaps el alemain and Sicily. There's were in fact minor battles compared to the huge battles in the east and in terms of lives lost hardly register.
But we focus couldon Our glory, but the Russians and for good reason.
Name 3 great wwii movies. Easy I think
Name 3 wwii movies on eastern front... not that easy.
