Off Topic Trumpy pumpy.
- Thread starter HugoEkitikeN01
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
2011, that was quite old, 2017
Ireland is high because the country is a corrupt banana republic
You must log in or register to see images
Ireland is high because the country is a corrupt banana republic
Did you ever consider that the cheap places are also cheap economies there.... just a thought
I'd say it has some impact and have not looked into it, but there is no escaping the fact the high prices in Germany Denmark and NSW Australia are driven by renewable. Renewable produces energy that is not even needed, for example California had to pay another state to take the excess energy last year, after tax payers paid for that energy to be produced.
Germany is Europe's biggest economy. Wholesale prices for energy went nearly negative in 2017 and household prices went up further.
Germany is building more coal power plants
Dutch trains are "all wind powered" except in Winter where they get power from Germany to power the trains, and Germany burns filthy lignite coal to power dutch trains in winter. Those wind producers get paid even when there is no wind power being generated and land owners get paid no matter what.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ear...-a-year-from-wind-turbine-says-landowner.html
I will make £80K a year from wind turbine, says landowner
Ireland's prices are because the country is a Banana republic, a racketeering operation.
Spain is financially ****ed and you can't just power your factory with solar, you need to pay a fee for that apparently.
Italy ditto. Bent
Portugal ditto. Bent
You will find MITO that the states with low costs don't have large renewable footprints, cos coal is cheap
Spain is financially ****ed and you can't just power your factory with solar, you need to pay a fee for that apparently.
Italy ditto. Bent
Portugal ditto. Bent
You will find MITO that the states with low costs don't have large renewable footprints, cos coal is cheap
Yes, it's a **** system where Elon musk will say batteries are the way to go.. to make billions.
It's over complex and needs redesign of entire system imo.
There's a lot of little traps in there no question
Technology is not there, and Musk is a brilliant scam artist, he made 600 million on junk bonds.
Hyperloop is a tragic joke, solar city is hilariously tragic too.
SpaceX wouldn't dare put people into one of its rockets.
You need Russian rockets for that We have nuclear power. It's the best option we have for developed nations
For developing nations the following holds true
* Cheap energy develops them faster
* Development reduces pollution
* Development reduces birth rates
Answer is cheap coal energy and get developing and poor nations up to the standards we enjoy in developed nations.
This can be done in a few decades, but not with anti cheap energy policies like the war on coal.
Ironically Soros (Obama chum) is buying up coal, while putting millions into anti coal (globull warming) movements.
WHAT IS GEORGE SOROS DOING WITH HIS COAL INVESTMENTS
http://minersnews.com/news/2015/MN172-2.html
"Let's not politicise it by talking about gun control now (meaning ever)"
.......flys to Florida to get a photo grinning at the bedside of one of the shooting victims.......
Tbf her parents need a slap for allowing it.
.......flys to Florida to get a photo grinning at the bedside of one of the shooting victims.......
Tbf her parents need a slap for allowing it.
Technology is not there, and Musk is a brilliant scam artist, he made 600 million on junk bonds.
Hyperloop is a tragic joke, solar city is hilariously tragic too.
SpaceX wouldn't dare put people into one of its rockets.
We have nuclear power. It's the best option we have for developed nations
For developing nations the following holds true
* Cheap energy develops them faster
* Development reduces pollution
* Development reduces birth rates
Answer is cheap coal energy and get developing and poor nations up to the standards we enjoy in developed nations.
This can be done in a few decades, but not with anti cheap energy policies like the war on coal.
Ironically Soros (Obama chum) is buying up coal, while putting millions into anti coal (globull warming) movements.
WHAT IS GEORGE SOROS DOING WITH HIS COAL INVESTMENTS
http://minersnews.com/news/2015/MN172-2.html
Nah mate.
I agree that musk is pure cult of personality.
but coal energy... no. look at China for the evidence there. they built how much coal plants and are now transferring en masse to nuclear. the suffering and pollution caused by a single decade was enough for them to see right through that coal arguement.
the fact is micro power is a way to go in many countries. the utilities cringe st the thought of every house generating it's own power
this is why I say the whole system is a mess and needs a total rewrite.
oh Frank.
I get it, you want us to know you are virtuous and Trump is not.
You must log in or register to see images
Everyone is politicising the issue
So @DirtyFrank Trump recognises Jerusalem as Israel's capital and moves embassy there. Is this what you meant by Nazi?
Do you think he "should" have done that? I assume you are pro Issy? Or do you think it was a bad move?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...em-israel-capital-move-us-embassy-white-house
Do you think he "should" have done that? I assume you are pro Issy? Or do you think it was a bad move?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...em-israel-capital-move-us-embassy-white-house
oh Frank.
I get it, you want us to know you are virtuous and Trump is not.
You must log in or register to see images
Everyone is politicising the issue
i dont have a gun either.
lets not even go there.
trump is a vile ****. end of.
every president since that move to jerusalem was mooted has deferred it 6months on a rolling basis and he signed first time and not second cos he wanted attention.
hes just a complete narcissist and doesnt give a crap about a single human life except his own
wondering how that relates to my post or the one I was replying to ?
Reading fail, I am criticising Trump for the move, and no the move is only recent lol, re the embassy as is the recognition of Jerusalem as the capital.
"doesnt give a crap about a single human life except his own"
What you are saying is you do and Trump doesn't. Otherwise why would you say it if you didn't believe yourself more virtuous than Trump? Interesting.
You must log in or register to see images
Why do liberals feel the need to point out how other people are bad in ways they are not, or claim to be not, to be more exact
"hes just a complete narcissist and doesnt give a crap about a single human life except his own"
I agree on Narcissistic but so is every other high profile politician these days, Cameron, Macron, Obama Trudeau is an epic Narcissist that even Trump cannot compare to, the second bit "doesnt give a crap about a single human life except his own" is emotional drivel, nonsense, meaningless. Choose your words carefully, everyone should lest they look like idiots, and, such pointless baseless comments are wind
Now if you wouldn't mind explaining "trump is a vile ****. end of". At least then we can discuss tangible elements of Trump. I have a list of my own things I can't stand about him, so I am wondering if they are the same as yours, play ball
This for me is about challenging the facile and fallacious liberal narrative that is normally hysterical fact-less and emotional. It's not about liking or defending the orange moron
Reading fail, I am criticising Trump for the move, and no the move is only recent lol, re the embassy as is the recognition of Jerusalem as the capital.
"doesnt give a crap about a single human life except his own"
What you are saying is you do and Trump doesn't. Otherwise why would you say it if you didn't believe yourself more virtuous than Trump? Interesting.
You must log in or register to see images
Why do liberals feel the need to point out how other people are bad in ways they are not, or claim to be not, to be more exact
"hes just a complete narcissist and doesnt give a crap about a single human life except his own"
I agree on Narcissistic but so is every other high profile politician these days, Cameron, Macron, Obama Trudeau is an epic Narcissist that even Trump cannot compare to, the second bit "doesnt give a crap about a single human life except his own" is emotional drivel, nonsense, meaningless. Choose your words carefully, everyone should lest they look like idiots, and, such pointless baseless comments are wind
Now if you wouldn't mind explaining "trump is a vile ****. end of". At least then we can discuss tangible elements of Trump. I have a list of my own things I can't stand about him, so I am wondering if they are the same as yours, play ball
This for me is about challenging the facile and fallacious liberal narrative that is normally hysterical fact-less and emotional. It's not about liking or defending the orange moron
you ought to read the history about that embassy move
trump is vile scum.
every man jack on this site is better than trump.... well except for matth who would have already nuked us.
im not bothered arguing how much a vile **** trump is. if you cant see it already... well...
"trump is vile scum."
I don't see any meaning in that tbh. It's so easy to just say that, without any substance.
"every man jack on this site is better than trump.... well except for matth who would have already nuked us."
There may be ****s and rapists here, "may", seems like a baseless claim tbh
"im not bothered arguing how much a vile **** trump is. if you cant see it already... well..."
Now you see more than I, so not only are you more virtuous than Trump, you are more aware than I too.
Is there anything you can say that does not contain elements of your virtuousness self?
"trump is vile scum."
I don't see any meaning in that tbh. It's so easy to just say that, without any substance.
"every man jack on this site is better than trump.... well except for matth who would have already nuked us."
There may be ****s and rapists here, "may", seems like a baseless claim tbh
"im not bothered arguing how much a vile **** trump is. if you cant see it already... well..."
Now you see more than I, so not only are you more virtuous than Trump, you are more aware than I too.
Is there anything you can say that does not contain elements of your virtuousness self?
have you googled history of American embassy in Jerusalem or not?
Trumps actions re: the Embassy are a result of him being in the pocket of the Washington Zionists.
Trump is as transparent as tissue paper, he backs his fiscal backers.
As for him being a vile narcissistic idiot, he is, he’s a sex pest to boot.
Trump is as transparent as tissue paper, he backs his fiscal backers.
As for him being a vile narcissistic idiot, he is, he’s a sex pest to boot.
I won't disagree on the point of him being very pro Israel, it's patently obvious Tobes
Show me a billionaire who never gets told no that isn't
Though the locker talk of grab em by the pussy is not the basis for such claims.Powerful men abuse their positions and women like powerful men too, it's a double edged sword. Powerful men will take advantage and women will slut themselves out to powerful rich men too, for status and wealth.
it's so Non PC to talk about "toxic femininity" these days
There are not many Democrats or republicans that aren't pro Israel to be honest, Tulsi Gabbard maybe, can't think of another atm
Last edited: