Which is still five times more than what FSG paid for them.
Curious as to how much they've invested in the team over the years..
Which is still five times more than what FSG paid for them.
Most PL teams valuations shot up after the TV deal. I'd say Liverpool are worth around the £1billion mark.
Very, very little. Your average "net spend" on players is almost zero, your average wage up to the last 4 years was low, you have built "big stand" on the strength of a loan from them which they are claiming back so basically no real investment from their own resources.Curious as to how much they've invested in the team over the years..
Very, very little. Your average "net spend" on players is almost zero, your average wage up to the last 4 years was low, you have built "big stand" on the strength of a loan from them which they are claiming back so basically no real investment from their own resources.
Very, very little. Your average "net spend" on players is almost zero, your average wage up to the last 4 years was low, you have built "big stand" on the strength of a loan from them which they are claiming back so basically no real investment from their own resources.
TBH I think they are making enough out of you at the moment to keep them happy, where has all the extra TV and Sponsorship revenue gone over the last few years?In that period revenue has gone up considerably too.
They probably missed their best chance of selling us after last season. I can't see us getting much further without serious investment.
Me, the club or the owners?Last 4 years eh?....
What have you spent? Just out of interest..
TBH I think they are making enough out of you at the moment to keep them happy, where has all the extra TV and Sponsorship revenue gone over the last few years?
It doesn't go down well with most me saying this because I am a Manc, but I do really wonder about it because I see teams like Stoke, and Westham spending more with less sponsorship, smaller crowds and no extra money from CL/EL etc.

Me, the club or the owners?
I have spent about £250 on the few games I have been to.
The club have spent around £300m on players after sales.
The owners have probably not had to spend anything, they let the club spend what is needed then take their dividends out of what is left (unless you think they are holding us back on this).
1, didn't know about so fair enoughGiving a serious answer to what I consider a spurious question.
1. 50mil into kirkby.
2. 120mil into main stand.
3. 50mil to pay off some debt, interest free loans to balance books.
Lfc are spending lfc money. To think that some strange off the book siphoning is occurring is silly. Fsg make a **** tonne hawking their crap alongside ours don't you worry.
They are creaming it their way but there is not a pay fsg 100mil line on the club balance sheet
Hey, all I did was give an honest opinion as an answer to the question "how much have our owners invested in the club".No no...just thinking we all sometimes forget it's about what happens on the pitch.. unless it's about watching stockmarkets...
The money means **** all if it does nothing there does it?
I mean say we sell Coutinho...and trust that the touted offers were real. ****, that means we have 2/3rds of the money the owners paid for club in the bank...with that new stand etc...
Is that a good thing? Not if we keep playing like yesterday lol...
You lot won at home....well...must feel good and almost new lol
1, didn't know about so fair enough
2, isn't that a loan like 3 which they are getting back?
Seriously, do you not think you should have much more to spend on players given the extra TV and sponsorship deals? other clubs seem to have it who are not as attractive as you.
Wasn't really disagreeing...we've spent pretty much at the level we are. Personally think our owners naievely believed ffp would actually be effectual...if so we might have been in the gameHey, all I did was give an honest opinion as an answer to the question "how much have our owners invested in the club".
Barca getting spanked. Clearly gonna be a bit desperate, £150m for Couts or **** off![]()
1, didn't know about so fair enough
2, isn't that a loan like 3 which they are getting back?
Seriously, do you not think you should have much more to spend on players given the extra TV and sponsorship deals? other clubs seem to have it who are not as attractive as you.
And of course there was nobody else of the same quality available. Never mind, that just means it will still be available in January or even next summer when the new transfer budget is added60-70m on VVD. 70m on Keita. Money was available but can't force clubs to sell unfortunately.

And of course there was nobody else of the same quality available. Never mind, that just means it will still be available in January or even next summer when the new transfer budget is added
A few weeks back I told an Australian Leicester supporter that any club can put a big bid in for a player if they know it won't be accepted![]()