No, i said Henry couldn't carry this team to a trophy, read the post properly before having a go please.
No you didn't, you said
With Wenger as manager, even Henry in his prime couldn't lead this lot to the title.
No, i said Henry couldn't carry this team to a trophy, read the post properly before having a go please.
With Wenger as manager, even Henry in his prime couldn't lead this lot to the title.
No you didn't, you said
That is one of the stupidest quotes I've seen on this site.Exactly, with Wenger as manager, Henry couldn't lead this current side to a trophy.

That is one of the stupidest quotes I've seen on this site.![]()
REally Mr. IQ of 140Wise words coming from one of the stupidest people i've seen on this site
, Mr. All foreign fans are plastic 

REally Mr. IQ of 140, Mr. All foreign fans are plastic
By your logic we are 2nd on GD with in your words a "crap" striker yet you assume if we had one one of the best strikers in history in his prime we wouldn't be far higher up the table. You're proven wrong by YOUR OWN logic![]()
We're 2nd in GD because of a stingy defence and goalscoring Midfielders. If we had Henry in his prime, chances are we'd either misuse him, get him injured or some such BS that only we can do.
Only a few days til the window opens! Who do we think might be on Wengers shopping list this winter?
Berbatov, £5m...deal.
Personally I think that if we had Henry in his prime, we'd be a few points clear at the top because he's exactly the type of striker that we're missing at the moment.
I still think everyone is still obsessed with this concept of one player being "better" than another, and not recognizing that a mediocre player that fits the team well may be more useful than a great player that doesn't fit at all.
It is a totally hypothetical question which is completely nonsensical anyway, but I am really interested that the majority seem to think that football is so simple that you just have to find the 11 "best" players to win. Put Henry in a team and you automatically make it better. Surely Tottenham and Chelsea have proven that the game is far more complex than that and there is no outright "best" player.
Henry was amazing at Arsenal because he found a position, role and a team that gave him the perfect environment for his talents. Up until then, he was merely average.
Put him back into a team that didn't suit him, perhaps even in a team that faced packed defences and teams playing against him on the counterattack, and he might be average again.
Also interesting that the campaign against Giroud is reaching Ramsey proportions and infesting every single thread on the forum. It seems all over the Internet right now as well. Even his supporters are wishy-washy in their defense. I just don't get it. The guy is putting in a huge shift every game. It is not that we couldn't see it coming though, even at the start of the season, when he was banging them in, we were being told that we needed to upgrade our striker. If ever there was a self-fulfilling prophecy, this is it.
****ing negative supporters have put so much pressure on our best striker, it is no wonder he is struggling.
I think it is an even bigger disgrace how he is being treated than it was when they were doing it to Ramsey or Eboue.
And i think you're a nutjob who hasn't got a ****ing clue what he's babbling on about. Give it a rest will you.
im pretty sure he could say the same about you
And i think you're a nutjob who hasn't got a ****ing clue what he's babbling on about. Give it a rest will you.