i think they've got confused with all the talk of pulis. he is merely being bandied around as a possible replacement should adams leave his post. as far as i'm aware, i've not read a single city fan who's said they'd be over the moon to have him in charge but the point i've been putting forward is that a) i think our players might work well with him in charge, and b) he may very well see our club as an attractive proposition, more so than those from binland seem to appreciate. his stock is very high right now - despite his limitations, it would be seen as a coup to get him (rightly or wrongly). i think that's worth discussing.
Yep. You're right. It was probably an easy mistake to make given how much stick they've been given on here.
Sensibly, I think Tweedle-dum and Tweedle-dee have resigned on this one.
All fair points and I can honestly see where you're coming from. As I said before, Pulis has to be about as safe a bet for promotion as the appointment of any Manager could be. But I would find that very hard to reconcile with my distaste for the style. Obviously I'd be supportive, but I'd like to think we could appoint a non-Pulis and with the squad we've got still achieve promotion anyway. It's would be a balance of weighing up the sacrifice.


