Tiote v's Cattermole

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Not reading through 10 pages of guranteed bickering but isn't this thread missing the point. Shouldn't it be Cattermole vs Our creative element and Tiote vs theirs. Bit pointless to have the two defensive mids having a face off
 
Tiote is almost certain to be playing for a champions league team in a year or two (and no i don't mean Newcastle), if he was english then i reckon he'd be an easy squad choice for the national team. Cattermole is a good young player who seems to have spells where he looks like he could be a very very good player (like at the moment) and spells where he simply looks like a liability, if he can be consistent then he will be mentioned as a possible national team player but i'm not convinced by him yet. Great prospect though.
 
Oh wait , it was Sal we were going to!

One of the all inclusive hotels where hotel is included in flight package but can't remember the name of the hotel.

EDIT : Hotel name is Riu Gropa.

Garopa, not Gropa - that sounds rude! I stayed in the Funana - same complex and shared facilities. If you are prone to weight gain, be careful. I put on a stone in a fortnight!
 
Are they not reset in January or something though??

Here you go but yes and no lol
SEASON 2011/2012

Note: FTCM are matches in the following competitions: FA Challenge Cup [FA Cup], FA Challenge Trophy, FA Premier League, Football League, Football League Cup [Carling Cup], Football League Trophy, the Football Conference and The FA WSL.

(i) If a Player accumulates five cautions in FTCM between the opening day of the Playing Season and 31 December (including any FTCM played on that day) in the same Season, he will be suspended automatically for a period covering: - One First Team Match

(ii) If a Player accumulates five cautions in FTCM between the opening day of the Playing Season and the last day of the same Season, he will be: - “Warned as to his Future Conduct”

(iii) If a Player accumulates ten cautions in FTCM between the opening day of the Playing Season and the second Sunday of April in the same Season, he will be suspended automatically for a period covering:- Two First Team matches

(iv) If a Player accumulates ten cautions in FTCM between the opening day of the Playing Season and the last day of the same Season, he will be: - “Severely Censured and Warned as to his future Conduct”

(v) If a Player accumulates 15 cautions in FTCM between the opening date of the Playing Season and the last day of the same Season, he will be suspended automatically for a period covering: - Three First Team matches

(vi) A Player who has already been subject to disciplinary action as a result of receiving five, ten and 15 cautions, and who goes on to receive 20 cautions in FTCM in the same Season, shall be required to attend a meeting of a Regulatory Commission, within seven days of the date of the last caution. The Members of a Regulatory Commission will have the power to deal with the Player in such manner as they deem fit. The same procedure will apply for every further five cautions received by that Player.

(vii) Any period of suspension arising from cautions will commence forthwith. The suspension will cover all approved First Team matches until such time as his Club’s First Team has completed the number of matches appropriate to the punishment in approved Competitions during the period covered by its opening league match and ending with the final match in which the Club is playing in an approved domestic Competition.

(viii) Any period of suspension or part thereof which remains outstanding at the end of a Season must be served at the commencement of the next following Season.
 
Is this a joke question ????? I would expect one of their muppets to come up with such a stupid article.
Cattermole is a shocking average dirty midfield, a good game for him is staying on the pitch 4 90 mins
 
Is this a joke question ????? I would expect one of their muppets to come up with such a stupid article.
Cattermole is a shocking average dirty midfield, a good game for him is staying on the pitch 4 90 mins

You clearly haven't watched him since Mon took over then.
 
As I stated a good game for him is staying on the field for 90 mins which since your messiah has came in he has done so
You obviously aint seen much of Tiote if you are even trying to compare him
 
As I stated a good game for him is staying on the field for 90 mins which since your messiah has came in he has done so
You obviously aint seen much of Tiote if you are even trying to compare him

Yawn!
The same Tiote that Sessi made look lower league class?
 
When did that happen, im having trouble remembering it. The only time i can think of is the only time they have met which was a derby at the SoS which we won and sess was pants

So when your fellows were defending Tiote's **** performance when Sessi was embarrassing him and blaming it on Rhamadamadingdong was bullshit?
 
So when your fellows were defending Tiote's **** performance when Sessi was embarrassing him and blaming it on Rhamadamadingdong was bullshit?

I can remember us remarking he wasnt the same player in his fasted dehydrated state. However even in that condition sess still wasnt able to give him the run around as well you know. If our DM was indeed given such a runaround then surely your lot should have been able to fashion at least one good chance
 
I can remember us remarking he wasnt the same player in his fasted dehydrated state. However even in that condition sess still wasnt able to give him the run around as well you know. If our DM was indeed given such a runaround then surely your lot should have been able to fashion at least one good chance

As I well know?
The reason I said it was because it was true.
The problem was Sessi was one of the only ones turned up that day.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.