Off Topic This Andrew thing

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

123Daveyboy

Well-Known Member
Sep 18, 2018
3,265
3,739
113
75
Looks like he has been a bit of a bad lad, has he actually broken the law. Or is it just bad for the royal family?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smug in Boots
Looks like he has been a bit of a bad lad, has he actually broken the law. Or is it just bad for the royal family?

In reality there are two forms of 'guilty'.

There's guilty in law and guilty in my opinion.

The prosecution must prove their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in law ...

... in my mind there is no doubt so he's guilty as far as I'm concerned..

It's beyond any reason that someone should give a total stranger £10million ...

... the King and the rest of the Royal Family clearly agree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LAMackem and TonyG
The arsehole formerly known as Prince Andrew
- got everything he deserved.

Glad to see he's leaving Berkshire :emoticon-0102-bigsm
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smug in Boots
Not defending him as he's undefendable but if this lass has been passed around in her teen years by these ****'s. how come the only one she's singling out is the rich guy who lived in a Palace?I
Or am I missing something here.?
 
  • Like
Reactions: HoratioCarter
Not defending him as he's undefendable but if this lass has been passed around in her teen years by these ****'s. how come the only one she's singling out is the rich guy who lived in a Palace?I
Or am I missing something here.?
She has literally singled out loads and most are being kept hidden from the public. His name came out because of the photo being leaked. Interested to know what prime minister abused her though!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smug in Boots
Let's hope if he gets lifted he tells the whole world about the others who were involved.
How only two people have been sent to prison one dead and the other Maxwell is beyond belief.
This is becoming like the grooming scandal in this country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makemstine Roger
He was known as Randy Andy for a decade. It wasn’t well hidden but no one can speak out against the royals.
At the time people were going mad about disability allowance the multi millionaire business using our land to get rich that is the royals got a pay rise. Not a sniff of criticism. It’s time we changed this archaic nonsense. Hopefully this triggers off some critical thinking.
 
I recently watched the interview of the former royal security policeman (it’s on YouTube). He basically said 20 officers guarded senior royals over 3 or 4 shifts. So possibly 80 officers in a day were likely guarding him. If he was at a Woking Piza establishment or Tramp nightclub it would be fairly easy to debunk Virgina's story I would guess.

The late Queens favourite son? She ok’d paying £12m to keep the lass quiet. Shameful.

For a country without a pot to piss in we really need to look at the costs of this disfunctional family. If they lived in a council house and not their palaces they would be classed as a problem family.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coastal Dolphins
If as she says she was forced to have sex with him, I don’t understand why she went back 3 times?
In fairness mate she was a young lass passed around by very rich and powerful men.

That island was particularly creepy. God knows what was going through the young lasses minds when they were on there…I would guess no was not a word they could use.
 
In reality there are two forms of 'guilty'.

There's guilty in law and guilty in my opinion.

The prosecution must prove their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in law ...

... in my mind there is no doubt so he's guilty as far as I'm concerned..

It's beyond any reason that someone should give a total stranger £10million ...

... the King and the rest of the Royal Family clearly agree.
Wasn’t a very good deal, was it?

If I’d been Randy Andy I’d have told her to Feck Right AFF!!

Bart
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makemstine Roger
He's not randy, he's a peedophile ...

..he paid up to avoid criminal charges, you'd have done the same.
I know he’s a peedo but there was no need to get into dialogue with her IMO.
He shouldn’t have done the TV interview either.
If I’d been him I’d have said feck all, and went on a very long holiday, <laugh><laugh><laugh>

What’s happening to him now - couldn’t have happened to a nicer bloke. <laugh><laugh><laugh>

Bart
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makemstine Roger
mammy paid up to shut the lassie up...unfortunately she decided to do a 'full write up' adding many more names (apparently) and those names want the story out as much as andy does.

they can no longer touch her so my thoughts are that plenty of millions will be floating into plenty of bank accounts soon or maybe a few 'strange deaths'...i would also take a wild guess at a few world leaders want it kept quiet.
 
mammy paid up to shut the lassie up...unfortunately she decided to do a 'full write up' adding many more names (apparently) and those names want the story out as much as andy does.

they can no longer touch her so my thoughts are that plenty of millions will be floating into plenty of bank accounts soon or maybe a few 'strange deaths'...i would also take a wild guess at a few world leaders want it kept quiet.
Tax payers money ultimately. Why build hospitals and schools when you can fund a family to get up to all sorts of antics and pay people off to keep it quiet. Certainly tarnished the Queens name (not the new adulteress one).
 
Looks like he has been a bit of a bad lad, has he actually broken the law. Or is it just bad for the royal family?

He has not been tried, let alone proven guilty of a crime.

But he has been shown to repeatedly lie about his connections with a convicted *****phile. It is fair to wonder why.

I am not a royalist. But most people are and they deserve better than this fraud and wretched specimen being a part of the Royal Family.
 
Tax payers money ultimately. Why build hospitals and schools when you can fund a family to get up to all sorts of antics and pay people off to keep it quiet. Certainly tarnished the Queens name (not the new adulteress one).
Historically the Royal family have produced a net positive economic benefit of well over £1bn pa. They get taxpayer money to carry out their duties. The same duties which result in significant economic value. The profita from the crown estate go back to the public purse.

The net contribution has lessened in recent years. But they are still net wealth creators for the country. Our King is slimming down the royal family cost of operations to respond to this downturn.

Purely from an economic standpoint I have no idea why folk would criticise the royal family. Too many in this country seem to have a chip on their shoulder about wealthy folk, when in reality many of them create wealth for the economy as a whole. Good luck to us once we have driven every last one to other countries.
 
Historically the Royal family have produced a net positive economic benefit of well over £1bn pa. They get taxpayer money to carry out their duties. The same duties which result in significant economic value. The profita from the crown estate go back to the public purse.

The net contribution has lessened in recent years. But they are still net wealth creators for the country. Our King is slimming down the royal family cost of operations to respond to this downturn.

Purely from an economic standpoint I have no idea why folk would criticise the royal family. Too many in this country seem to have a chip on their shoulder about wealthy folk, when in reality many of them create wealth for the economy as a whole. Good luck to us once we have driven every last one to other countries.
No chip on the shoulder here but as a general point plenty visit Versailles without the expectation of meeting a royal. The way that family treat their workers says a lot. Looks an interesting read the Fall of the Yorks.

Andrew and his late mother have behaved appallingly and good to see a small bit of justice. Fair play to Charlie for that but Mountbatten or whatever he is called now needs to be sent to the US to answer some serious questions.
 
Historically the Royal family have produced a net positive economic benefit of well over £1bn pa. They get taxpayer money to carry out their duties. The same duties which result in significant economic value. The profita from the crown estate go back to the public purse.

The net contribution has lessened in recent years. But they are still net wealth creators for the country. Our King is slimming down the royal family cost of operations to respond to this downturn.

Purely from an economic standpoint I have no idea why folk would criticise the royal family. Too many in this country seem to have a chip on their shoulder about wealthy folk, when in reality many of them create wealth for the economy as a whole. Good luck to us once we have driven every last one to other countries.
Going on my lifetime observation, very high percentage of anti royal sentiment is down to religious upbringing,which is probably plausible really
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makemstine Roger