Off Topic The Wimbledon thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Julian Edelman said:
Murray injured and Djokovic has lost his way.
He wouldn't beat them 2 if fully fit.
FACT.
Click to expand...
Your quote: ( Of course you mean't wouldn't)
"I think you're right Federer has been extremely lucky this year.
He would have touched Djokovic or Murray in peak form."

Peak form, Federer would beat any tennis player that has ever lived. In fact, he's beaten everyone in the most recent history of the game (last 17 years).
He is playing the best I have ever seen him play. Did you watch any of his matches this championship ? He's light years ahead of the other two ( 1 & 2) seeds, the injuries to them are irrelevant. Look at his history. Watch him for the rest of this tournament.
 
tigerscanada said:
Your quote: ( Of course you mean't wouldn't)
"I think you're right Federer has been extremely lucky this year.
He would have touched Djokovic or Murray in peak form."

Peak form, Federer would beat any tennis player that has ever lived. In fact, he's beaten everyone in the most recent history of the game (last 17 years).
He is playing the best I have ever seen him play. Did you watch any of his matches this championship ? He's light years ahead of the other two ( 1 & 2) seeds, the injuries to them are irrelevant. Look at his history. Watch him for the rest of this tournament.
Click to expand...
Dont agree.
 
originallambrettaman said:
We have a no politics rule, we don't have a no sexism rule.

Discussing the quality of someone's norks is perfectly fine, as long as it's done tastefully and nobody brings up Fiona Bruce.
Click to expand...

I don't think that's what he's getting at, I imagine he's asking why there is a rule for one and not the other?

Just saying 'ones a rule and the other isnt' isn't an answer.
 
I don't think saying someone has nice boobies is sexist.

I don't think anyone would even suggest it was sexist if it was the equivalent being said about a man.

(Not boobies obviously.)
 
balkan tiger said:
You should have put yourself forward to be a forum moderator. It would have been enlightening.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't moderate anything, don't really believe in censorship. My policy would be 'If you choose to come on here then anything goes, if you don't like it then **** the **** off'.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back