1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

The Third Referendum

Discussion in 'Hull City' started by Leon T Trout AFC, Jun 28, 2016.

?

Should a permanent politcs thread be kept on this forum

  1. Yes

  2. No

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. BOJACKHCAFCMAN

    BOJACKHCAFCMAN Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    6,378
    Likes Received:
    1,923
    A politics thread might be a good idea, segregate some of the dumdums who go on about armchair managers as they obviously aren't open to football debate. Make it a general one so they can chat **** about anything and nobody has to read it
     
    #61
  2. FILEYseadog

    FILEYseadog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    6,767
    Likes Received:
    4,685
    No because everyone would find out im more left wing then J Corbyn.
     
    #62
  3. Leon T Trout AFC

    Leon T Trout AFC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2013
    Messages:
    7,027
    Likes Received:
    4,592
    Thanks to everyone who has voted so far. It’s good to read people’s opinions, both for and against having a thread on politics.

    There have also been some good counter ideas, such as a general ‘off topic’ thread where politics, amongst other topics, can be discussed.

    However, analysing the results so far seems to suggest that most forum members do not object to the creation of a permanent politics thread. So far, the consensus seems to be indifference: it speaks volumes.

    As OLM points out, the Hull City Not606 forum has an impressive 2,500 strong membership and so far only just over 1.5% of these members have objected to the idea of a permanent politics thread.

    I look forward to hopefully reading more views on my suggestion, equally both for and against.

    Thanks
     
    #63
  4. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    111,606
    Likes Received:
    75,774
    The majority voted against it, I'm afraid the vote was lost.

    Which is a blessing, as I'm pretty certain it would have been regretted within weeks.
     
    #64
  5. The greengrocer

    The greengrocer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2013
    Messages:
    5,858
    Likes Received:
    2,224
    More than Raheem Sterling?
     
    #65
    FILEYseadog likes this.
  6. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    111,606
    Likes Received:
    75,774
    No politics rule remains in place, hence all the political comments being deleted. <ok>
     
    #66
  7. Leon T Trout AFC

    Leon T Trout AFC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2013
    Messages:
    7,027
    Likes Received:
    4,592


    A couple of days ago, you correctly pointed out that 42/2500 voters wasn't ‘…really representative [of the forum]’ so surely you don’t now believe that 73/2500 is?

    I never, at any point, suggested the terms of this question – nor did anyone else. It seems quite presumptive for you to now claim that the resulting decision is purely based on votes cast.

    The question was to find out what members thought and it cannot be denied that the vast majority of members have spoken by proxy of apathy– they do not care if there if there is a political thread therefore, by allowing a political thread, it only 'disappoints' a small number of the forum.

    In fact, to be crystal clear, as stated, less than 2% of the members have voted against it so far.

    Additionally, contrary to your use of of tense, the poll is open for seven days and there’s still time for a true majority to vote either way.

    Thanks
     
    #67
  8. City Man

    City Man Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2016
    Messages:
    12,692
    Likes Received:
    8,886
    Can't see this post lasting long either. Enjoy it before it gets deleted.
     
    #68

Share This Page