Glastonbury strikes me as one of those annual events that interests a relatively small proportion of the public but, particularly through BBC coverage, we all have to 'enjoy' the saturated coverage. A friend of mine is there and her Facebook coverage is intolerable. "Ooh! look at me! look at me! I'm at Glasto, dahlinks! I've got designer wellies and my very own yurt (whatever that is); I bet you're sooooo jealous!"
Well, actually, no. No, I'm not.
I enjoy bits of the Glastonbury coverage, though I suspect I'd hate being there. Bands are meant to be seen in clubs. Good for the BBC, they are meant to cover things that not everyone likes.
Pixies were great, and my 5 minutes of Metallica confirmed that decades of avoiding them and their ilk were wisely invested.
Well I for one delight in the blanket coverage of Glastonbury and will watch it all weekend. Well done BBC.
Personally I'd rather fasten my John Thomas to a workbench with a rusty nail.I love the Glastonbury coverage. I just don't get Arcade Fire though, their frontman has such a powerless voice. I thought the Pixies were awesome last night. Anyway, far rather see hours of music on telly than the dreadful, waste of life that is cricket which infects hours of license fee time most summers.
Well I for one delight in the blanket coverage of Glastonbury and will watch it all weekend. Well done BBC.
Someone said Aphex Twin played under his monicker AFX. Can anyone confirm this? (or does anyone else care!)