I don't think there's a pundit, bar say Steve Claridge or Lee Dixon, who actually puts a huge amount of work and research into what they do. Garth Crooks is no different to many of the others, but he seems to wind a few people up. He doesn't bug me because 1] He was a very good footballer in his time and his opinion carries some authority, and 2] he at least thinks about what he says, rather than trots out the smug comment. OK, so he sees the odd thing from a different angle occasionally. So what..?