Read it a million years ago at school but I enjoyed it then. Might give it a go again. Preferred Animal Farm.
Always thought you'd be in to bestiality
Read it a million years ago at school but I enjoyed it then. Might give it a go again. Preferred Animal Farm.
Did you not do that at school? Was on our syllabus...****ing Walford High, always choosing picture books for their neanderthals to read instead of proper books
Coincidently, last week I downloaded ‘1984’ on to my kindle (a bargain at 99p), as my best mate reckons I should be reading more classic books instead of watching ‘pool cleaning’ videos on Facebook.
Is it worth the effort ?
We did ‘Animal Farm’, ‘Of Mice and Men’ and ‘Midsummer Nights Dream.
You sound like my mate in the pub
As I remember, it was a difficult read because of all the double speak, but it is good. I'd imagine the more "grown up" me would find it an easier read instead of getting it forced down my throat as a 15 year old.
The John Hurt film version is very good too
You've got mates? Well done
We did ‘Animal Farm’, ‘Of Mice and Men’ and ‘Midsummer Nights Dream.
You sound like my mate in the pub
Only in my head
Lord of the Flies (superb), Of Mice and Men (not for me), and Romeo and Juliet (hated it) as well as 1984 - think that was because we were doing O levels that year so it was very topical
You must log in or register to see media
And just show all my Labour voting chums that things will never change
Those in charge can't stop you reading booksYeah I guess it’s whatever is on the school curriculum that year that chooses what we read at school.
It’s sad that most don’t read books now
as much as we used to, due to the massive influx of entertainment out there..social media, NetFlix, Sky etc.
Maybe it’s what those in charge want…a massive ‘dumbing down’ of society
You must log in or register to see media
Sanctions are working then
You must log in or register to see media
#itsallascam
Do you reckon Russia will sell to the "Scottish terrorists" it wants to train, then we can sell it on for mega bucks too...we have the refineries already!
Sturgeon has been in contact already, so I’m led to believe
Sorry Beth I am sitting slack jawed at your first paragraph. If we, collectively, decide that we no longer want a head of state based on family they are born into and God’s permission, then the royal family would just have to go. There wouldn’t be a ‘bloody coup’ or a civil war, they would just **** off, and not a moment too soon. It’s got nothing to do with their ‘willingness’, they are in their current position because we give them permission to be there. Unless you believe that they really are there because of divine right.Two very different issues here
The monarchy...yes or no. I personally would like a scaled down monarchy ( they do after all represent an apolitical head of state) of the Dutch system....but that will take a while and a willingness of the Royal family to partake in the exercise, unless of course we go down the route of a bloody coup...and that would not be good
But the big issue for me is the police powers yesterday....their powers yesterday had just been bought in by this government... a government that has brought in voter id, powers of arrest, reduction in rights to protest....all restricting the rights of the people they are suppose to represent
"Oh its because the protesters have become more radical"....is the cry
Maybe the protesters are more radical because no one is listening, no dialogue exists....and our "leaders" are carrying on bleeding the country dry, financially and morally. The police were put in that position yesterday by the politicians.
It’s brilliant mate. Just don’t think of it as a prediction or science fiction. It’s a description of 100% totalitarianism. The 3 main characters show three different ways to respond to knowing you are being totally oppressed. Mr Orwell wasn’t great at writing women characters or describing ‘intimate’ scenes though.Coincidently, last week I downloaded ‘1984’ on to my kindle (a bargain at 99p), as my best mate reckons I should be reading more classic books instead of watching ‘pool cleaning’ videos on Facebook.
Is it worth the effort ?
Sorry Beth I am sitting slack jawed at your first paragraph. If we, collectively, decide that we no longer want a head of state based on family they are born into and God’s permission, then the royal family would just have to go. There wouldn’t be a ‘bloody coup’ or a civil war, they would just **** off, and not a moment too soon. It’s got nothing to do with their ‘willingness’, they are in their current position because we give them permission to be there. Unless you believe that they really are there because of divine right.
As I said above, I used to be pretty apathetic about the royal family until fairly recently. Now I am firmly against. I think Liz 2 was the last acceptable face of this hideous institution, thhough the actual people (whether or not they are *****s, adulterers, attention seekers, professional victims or whatever) are irrelevant, it’s the institution which cements a cowed hierarchy, where we doff our hats to our ‘betters’ that stinks.
It’s brilliant mate. Just don’t think of it as a prediction or science fiction. It’s a description of 100% totalitarianism. The 3 main characters show three different ways to respond to knowing you are being totally oppressed. Mr Orwell wasn’t great at writing women characters or describing ‘intimate’ scenes though.
Never endingly relevant.
What did you post it in relation to? *It’s really easy to brutalise people. There is no hope in the proles though, sadly.I posted this quote from 1984 a little while ago....
Last night to the flicks. All war films. One very good one of a ship full of refugees being bombed somewhere in the Mediterranean. Audience much amused by shots of a great huge fat man trying to swim away with a helicopter after him, first you saw him wallowing along in the water like a porpoise, then you saw him through the helicopters gunsights, then he was full of holes and the sea round him turned pink and he sank as suddenly as though the holes had let in the water, audience shouting with laughter when he sank. then you saw a lifeboat full of children with a helicopter hovering over it. there was a middle-aged woman might have been a jewess sitting up in the bow with a little boy about three years old in her arms. little boy screaming with fright and hiding his head between her breasts as if he was trying to burrow right into her and the woman putting her arms round him and comforting him although she was blue with fright herself, all the time covering him up as much as possible as if she thought her arms could keep the bullets off him. then the helicopter planted a 20 kilo bomb in among them terrific flash and the boat went all to matchwood. then there was a wonderful shot of a child's arm going up up up right up into the air a helicopter with a camera in its nose must have followed it up and there was a lot of applause from the party seats but a woman down in the prole part of the house suddenly started kicking up a fuss and shouting they didnt oughter of showed it not in front of kids they didnt it aint right not in front of kids it aint until the police turned her turned her out i dont suppose anything happened to her nobody cares what the proles say typical prole reaction they never --
Highly relevant.
What did you post it in relation to? *It’s really easy to brutalise people. There is no hope in the proles though, sadly.
* must have been small boat migrants of course.