Just looked up the oath of allegiance as pledged by our armed forces. Those on here who have served will of course remember it.
"I swear by almighty God that I will be faithful, and bear true allegiance to his Majesty King Charles III, his heirs and successors, and that I will as in duty bound, honestly and faithfully defend his Majesty, his heirs and successors in person, crown and dignity, against all enemies, and will observe and obey all orders of His Majesty, his heirs and successors and the generals and officers set over me."
Interesting that there is zero mention of country in there, which I wasn’t aware of. I suppose it dates back to when the monarch was literally the embodiment of the state. Doubt it’s important but it’s seems a bit incongruous nowadays, perhaps an oath to King and Country would make more sense.
Listening to all the historic wording over these last few days, it is clear that they don't really apply to modern day.
Maybe we shouldn't take this stuff too literally and accept it as tradition?
Some would want all tradition updated I suppose.
I think the stuff about the Scottish Church needs updating, so maybe there is a case for it in some cases.
