Trixie-Bell Scnuffle-Lumps to his boyfriends.
Rees-Mogg boils a live puppy every time he loses a bet.
Trixie-Bell Scnuffle-Lumps to his boyfriends.
Rees-Mogg boils a live puppy every time he loses a bet.
Every now and then he gives one to borisRees-Mogg boils a live puppy every time he loses a bet.
Every now and then he gives one to boris
Here we go again.
Can’t blame people for hoovering up cheap shares tbh. My issue would be if there’s any sort of insider trading going on which given the spindly old nonce’s position it seems virtually impossible he wouldn’t be privy to information before the rest of us that affects the stocks he’s trading in.


I'm not far wrong though am I?
I think we knew this already...
You must log in or register to see media
I have no idea as your modus operandi seems to be to just throw out vague, hate-filled stuff in accordance with your own personal bias without really articulating any concrete facts.
Incidentally, I don't care for JR-M either, but doubt he's particularly crooked. I suspect much of the hate towards him is borne of his plumby accent and privileged upbringing more that anything particularly tangible, i.e. he's rich and privileged ergo he must be bent.

Yeah I do that sometimes, time of the month.
He isn't very nice, how's that.![]()
I think we knew this already...
You must log in or register to see media
We all know he is a knob anyway.Give the guy a chance. Bit early to be expecting a ruthless cull after …….what was it,7 minutes in post? He was the only credible candidate in the running but has his work cut out making up lost ground for largely being the author of a hopeless position on Brexit.The problem is although Starmer is no Jezzahe is still part of the Previous muppet show. No one will vote for labour because unlike the Tories that had a cull of the deadwood and brought in fresh-faced droids, Labour still has Abbott/Jezza/Thornberry and the rest of the north London 2222show. Never learn.
Starmerites. What do they actually stand for? Wouldn't worry about power and control. He just needs to find his own Cummings. There always enough ambitious politicians around to rally around a new slogan and party line even if it is preaching as gospel something that is the polar opposite of the predecessor's line.As I see it there are three camps in Labour. Blairites, Starmerites and Corbynites. The Corbynites have had a communist like power over the party and I just can't see them giving it up easily. Starmer has to have his own team on the front bench or they'll pull the rug from under him. That means denying Corbynites and then there'll be trouble. Labour will only stand a chance of getting into power if they are a united party. I don't think Starmer is strong enough to do that
Of course not. Not every one who is rich and privileged is bent. Look at Prince Andrew.I have no idea as your modus operandi seems to be to just throw out vague, hate-filled stuff in accordance with your own personal bias without really articulating any concrete facts.
Incidentally, I don't care for JR-M either, but doubt he's particularly crooked. I suspect much of the hate towards him is borne of his plumby accent and privileged upbringing more that anything particularly tangible, i.e. he's rich and privileged ergo he must be bent.
Of course not. Not every one who is rich and privileged is bent. Look at Prince Andrew.
Of course not. Not every one who is rich and privileged is bent. Look at Prince Andrew.

Starmerites. What do they actually stand for? Wouldn't worry about power and control. He just needs to find his own Cummings. There always enough ambitious politicians around to rally around a new slogan and party line even if it is preaching as gospel something that is the polar opposite of the predecessor's line.