Sadly the posters didn't see the article, only you did. I don't see how they could comment? I just found it strange that you mentioned Vallance without supporting your argument. Still, we know that he didn't criticize the government so that's the main point that we can agree on.
George Galloway already calling Starmer 'Sir Phoney Blair'. Let's hope the Bell End's judgement has improved since as DPP refusing to charge Jimmy Savile due to 'lack of evidence'...
By the way, Tony Blair didn't say that. I was just doing a Watford by throwing in a name so people will think there is a connection. I was going to use Jezza but sadly he can't make a decision.
It’s really not my fault if you insist on being (pretending to be I expect) too thick to understand a simple point that had to be repeated several times to you.
Interesting as this gammonfest is, do any of you have a better suggestion for the make-up of the Shadow Cabinet? Not like Lammy came from very little to go to Harvard Law or anything.
It's not his academic ability that's being questioned. It's his balance and judgement. Suella Braverman has Indian origin but she'll represent the whole population as Attorney General. Lammy will just represent black people like him