Off Topic The Politics Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should the UK remain a part of the EU or leave?

  • Stay in

    Votes: 56 47.9%
  • Get out

    Votes: 61 52.1%

  • Total voters
    117
  • Poll closed .
Jean Claude Junket has been making 'threats' since before the Referendum, saying the deal would be so punitive to the UK that no other country would dare leave the EU. Mother Theresa makes perfectly understandable riposte and they all throw their toys out the pram, what should we do? Just roll over and let them tickle our belly? Get real, there are high stakes and we have to play as dirty as they will, perhaps that 'threat' will make some in the EU realise they have just as much to lose if they don't play reasonably...

You're right.

I don't have any issue with either side making positional statements prior to starting negotiations. I've done enough negotiating myself to know this is just posturing for the voters and will all be forgotten as soon as the work around the table begins. As you say, both sides have things to lose if this isn't done right. I don't think the EU has as much to lose as we do, but enough that they will want to minimise any losses - as I hope we also will.

What I don't like is the way some people in the media (real and social) are using this pre-negotiation posturing as an excuse to blow dog whistles and stir up anger amongst decent people. We all need clear heads now, not hot ones.

Posturing or not, threatening non-cooperation on security issues is just plain wrong in my eyes.
 
Posturing or not, threatening non-cooperation on security issues is just plain wrong in my eyes.

Of course, but she didn't mean it and the peeps on the other side know it. It's the only card she has in her pack that will keep her media supporters happy. I really despise the attitude that means we act as though we're at war with the EU just because the EU wants to take action to minimise the damage we're doing to them by leaving. We're better than that.

The UK electorate advised the Government of the time that they preferred to leave rather than stay. Some of the people who voted to leave think that also entitles them to dictate what the EU does, now we've told them we're off. The EU has its own priorities. Some of them may be in line with our own, some won't be.

BTW, Strolls, I didn't think you were blowing dog whistles or stirring up anger. That's done by people with cold hearts and hidden objectives.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stroller
Interesting interview with the PM of Estonia on Radio 4 Today, who thought that May's Article 51 letter was positive and who had no problem with reference to security because the EU needs to bear it in mind (Estonia may be heavily reliant on UK troops to man its eastern border).

I'm reading that certain serial remoaning MP's (Osborne, Farron, Clegg, Tony Blair, Anna Soubry and (hopefully) Nicky Morgan) are investigating starting a new political party. It's not yet April 1st, so I have to assume there's some truth in it. I hope it happens - perhaps they could Launch on a wooden raft pushed out to mid-Atlantic in bad weather
 
Of course, but she didn't mean it and the peeps on the other side know it. It's the only card she has in her pack that will keep her media supporters happy. I really despise the attitude that means we act as though we're at war with the EU just because the EU wants to take action to minimise the damage we're doing to them by leaving. We're better than that.

The UK electorate advised the Government of the time that they preferred to leave rather than stay. Some of the people who voted to leave think that also entitles them to dictate what the EU does, now we've told them we're off. The EU has its own priorities. Some of them may be in line with our own, some won't be.

BTW, Strolls, I didn't think you were blowing dog whistles or stirring up anger. That's done by people with cold hearts and hidden objectives.
Read a really good article in the Atlantic magazine (an impeccably liberal US publication, where most articles are slack jawed analyses of the Trump administration) which unfortunately doesn't allow me to link the piece. Using government sources from each country it set out the 27's priorities from the negotiations by country. There is very strong alignment around maintaining EU unity, protecting EU citizens and a budget/financial settlement. They want a trade deal too, but recognise that this is going to be more divisive amongst the 27 so will focus on the disentanglement first as the best way to keep a united front.

If the government accepts that what the 27 wants in the negotiation order is what it will be (I haven't read the Tusk document yet) I would have thought agreements in principle could be reached on citizens quickly, and if, as May said in her letter, we agree to meet our obligations re the money, this things could be done quickly and we move on to the future stuff. I have seen a potential figure of €35bn as the ask. If this was spread out over 4 years from 2019 it would be less than we pay in annually at the moment so should be manageable. Although I am pretty sure we will end up with a 'pay to play' trade agreement too. The people who can bugger everything up are the hard core Europhobic Tory MPs, like the one who wants to repeal everything single bit of 'ghastly' EU regulation.
 
I had to waste 10 minutes of my life last night listening to Alistair Campbell on This Week. To say he made himself look a tw@nt would be an understatement. He lied and gave false information only to be put down by Andrew Neil and Portillo. Portillo was talking a lot sense re the EU and how they work. Question Time was a bit boring, especially with the two scousers. The girl on the end stood out for me as she had all the facts and figures whereas the others just seem to waffle on with their political agenda.
 
Read a really good article in the Atlantic magazine (an impeccably liberal US publication, where most articles are slack jawed analyses of the Trump administration) which unfortunately doesn't allow me to link the piece. Using government sources from each country it set out the 27's priorities from the negotiations by country. There is very strong alignment around maintaining EU unity, protecting EU citizens and a budget/financial settlement. They want a trade deal too, but recognise that this is going to be more divisive amongst the 27 so will focus on the disentanglement first as the best way to keep a united front.

If the government accepts that what the 27 wants in the negotiation order is what it will be (I haven't read the Tusk document yet) I would have thought agreements in principle could be reached on citizens quickly, and if, as May said in her letter, we agree to meet our obligations re the money, this things could be done quickly and we move on to the future stuff. I have seen a potential figure of €35bn as the ask. If this was spread out over 4 years from 2019 it would be less than we pay in annually at the moment so should be manageable. Although I am pretty sure we will end up with a 'pay to play' trade agreement too. The people who can bugger everything up are the hard core Europhobic Tory MPs, like the one who wants to repeal everything single bit of 'ghastly' EU regulation.

I was thinking along those lines of 3-4 years at a descending rate to finally zero would be reasonable. The EU should be aware just how much we trade both ways and not set any silly tariffs that would actually harm the economies of some of their members.

Whatever the outcome I still think this is the beginning of the end for the EU...
 
Google, Amazon, Uber et al are all making a mint in this country and paying peanuts yet the Government does little to tackle them directly, it has taken a crowd-funding QC to take Uber to court over their refusal to give him a VAT receipt to test their excuse that they are a techology platform and not a cab firm...

http://www.legalcheek.com/2017/02/d...kes-uber-to-court-over-20-million-unpaid-vat/
The UK government should do to Uber what the Irish government have done, refuse them the right to operate unless the drivers are vetted and licenced in the interests of public safety. I see one of their driverless cars crashed this week in Arizona or somewhere and they are stopping the whole driverless car programme for the moment. Delighted for them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ELLERS
The UK government should do to Uber what the Irish government have done, refuse them the right to operate unless the drivers are vetted and licenced in the interests of public safety. I see one of their driverless cars crashed this week in Arizona or somewhere and they are stopping the whole driverless car programme for the moment. Delighted for them.
The police say it wasn't Ubers fault . I love Uber, much cheaper than a NY cab.
 
I was thinking along those lines of 3-4 years at a descending rate to finally zero would be reasonable. The EU should be aware just how much we trade both ways and not set any silly tariffs that would actually harm the economies of some of their members.

Whatever the outcome I still think this is the beginning of the end for the EU...

Fog in the English Channel - Europe cut off.
 
The UK government should do to Uber what the Irish government have done, refuse them the right to operate unless the drivers are vetted and licenced in the interests of public safety. I see one of their driverless cars crashed this week in Arizona or somewhere and they are stopping the whole driverless car programme for the moment. Delighted for them.

Yes but let's not forget the owners are entrepreneurs and innovators and are merely doing what this government applauds most. Making as much money as they can in a way that is entirely legal. I see a bit of political posturing to keep public opinion sweet but am yet to be convinced that Theresa May's government stands for ordinary working people whatever carefully scripted press announcements are put in front of her. I expect a bit of noise and an exhortation to Uber to play nicely with the public and then we can all concentrate on Brexit again
 
Read a really good article in the Atlantic magazine (an impeccably liberal US publication, where most articles are slack jawed analyses of the Trump administration) which unfortunately doesn't allow me to link the piece. Using government sources from each country it set out the 27's priorities from the negotiations by country. There is very strong alignment around maintaining EU unity, protecting EU citizens and a budget/financial settlement. They want a trade deal too, but recognise that this is going to be more divisive amongst the 27 so will focus on the disentanglement first as the best way to keep a united front.

If the government accepts that what the 27 wants in the negotiation order is what it will be (I haven't read the Tusk document yet) I would have thought agreements in principle could be reached on citizens quickly, and if, as May said in her letter, we agree to meet our obligations re the money, this things could be done quickly and we move on to the future stuff. I have seen a potential figure of €35bn as the ask. If this was spread out over 4 years from 2019 it would be less than we pay in annually at the moment so should be manageable. Although I am pretty sure we will end up with a 'pay to play' trade agreement too. The people who can bugger everything up are the hard core Europhobic Tory MPs, like the one who wants to repeal everything single bit of 'ghastly' EU regulation.

This bloke (the one the Tories always put up to take all the ****) couldn't even say that we would end up paying less than we do now.

You must log in or register to see media
 
Right As it's Easter coming up I have a house load of brats/eggs/DIY/family meals and rest time
No Brexit for Gibraltar without Spains OK. Load of bollocks.
I thought they were 27 united voices? <laugh>
Gibraltar? No chance. The Spanish are just being cheeky with that one. I would tell them to go jump off a rock. Will never happen so do let the press worry you.
 
Posturing or not, threatening non-cooperation on security issues is just plain wrong in my eyes.


FFS mate!! Our intelligence agencies will never, ever let innocent people die by withholding information. Even if the government were to propose such a thing (they won't), the agencies involved would continue anyway.
It is a fact, however, that the Countries on mainland Europe rely heavily on our intelligence services and we share intelligence with and get intelligence from other sources by and large known as the five eyes (UK, US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand).
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoldhawkRoad
No Brexit for Gibraltar without Spains OK. Load of bollocks.
And let's not forget any of the other 26, particularly the micro-states, who have to be persuaded by the deal. This is one of the major weaknesses of the EU. On most important decisions each country has effectively a veto or a cast iron delaying mechanism on any decision taken by the majority however large that may be simply because it does not suit their own national interest.
 
Right As it's Easter coming up I have a house load of brats/eggs/DIY/family meals and rest time...............

QUOTE]
Brats, eggs and family meals? You're worrying me now. I hope I don't read about gruesome goings on this weekend where the story begins with people complaining about the smell emanating from your barbecue
 
Right As it's Easter coming up I have a house load of brats/eggs/DIY/family meals and rest time

I thought they were 27 united voices? <laugh>
Gibraltar? No chance. The Spanish are just being cheeky with that one. I would tell them to go jump off a rock. Will never happen so do let the press worry you.
Gibraltar voted by 96% to remain in the EU. So presumably we don't really care what they want now anyway, just like the ****ing Scots.

The Spanish have already offered dual citizenship to all Gilbraltarians in exchange for joint sovereignty of the territory, which means the locals stay Brits and in the EU. Which is what they say they want.
 
Yes Family coming over for Easter :emoticon-0107-sweat. Sorry I should have finished the sentence. With all this going on I shall take a 2-week break from politics thread and let them get on with it.
After tomorrow that is.