The Not606 PL Board handbook

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Rule number 25:

Being your own person is important, but in the case of polls if there is an option which isn't necessarily your belief but will have great comedy factor, it is acceptable to go against your beliefs.
 
Last edited:
Rule number 24:

Being your own person is important, but in the case of polls if there is an option which isn't necessarily your belief but will have great comedy factor, it is acceptable to go against your beliefs.

Rule no 26 :

The OP should understand the rules of numbering the ****ing rules correctly !
 
  • Like
Reactions: Libby
Can somebody print these rules out so I can stick them on my wall. How the hell am I going to remember all of these? I thought we'd have like 3 or 4 criticals that we'd all abide by.
 
Rule 31:

If any poster that gives undeserved support, sycophancy or tries to defend the indefensible from another poster,
then they shall receive a barrage of 'rimming' insults.
 
Rule 32:

Any poster trying to claim that they only meant it as a 'joke' after their wum has spectacularly backfired on them,
shall expect to receive the full force of merciless piss taking.
 
Rule 34:

If you don't know any scores but see that @Skylarker has been called to work then you must realise that **** has gone down.
 
Rule 35. Never take a bet on without due diligence as to the consequences of the bet, or getting them explained to you
 
Well my role is to play Devils advocate on this thread because I think it's important to bring up any loop holes that may occur for the longevity of the handbook.

:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Libby
Well my role is to play Devils advocate on this thread because I think it's important to bring up any loop holes that may occur for the longevity of the handbook.

:)

That's the beauty of the thread mate... it's a bit of a **** around but we'll have Roofie quoting it by Christmas :)
 
So anyway rule number 1...maybe it's physically impossible for someone to post immediately following a game, could be many reasons.

Now what?
 
Plus there should be a set number of rules we are aiming for... you can't have 3000 rules. We will have to whittle them down to those that will pass the test of time.
 
Plus there should be a set number of rules we are aiming for... you can't have 3000 rules. We will have to whittle them down to those that will pass the test of time.

who should be judge on what rules pass?

I vote metths.