The "Mighty Juggernaut" thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hoddle is a god
  • Start date Start date
  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
You should beat Villa as they are ****e.

Anything less than 5 goals would seem like a loss, and another draw would be an awful result

yes I meant 6th it was a typo.
We should beat Villa, as things stand. They are poor, we are on a good run. But Spurs being Spurs we are likely to lose to Villa within a few weeks of beating City.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gooner4ever
How many spurs fans talk about the power shift on here ?

There are a few of us that exchange pms and discuss Levy selling Peter Crouch, which effectively killed the power shift.

If Crouch had stayed, we know the power shift would have happened, but unfortunately we made a dreadful decision to sell Peter.
 
There are a few of us that exchange pms and discuss Levy selling Peter Crouch, which effectively killed the power shift.

If Crouch had stayed, we know the power shift would have happened, but unfortunately we made a dreadful decision to sell Peter.

Things might have turned out differently if you'd kept hold of David Bentley :tongue:
 
I will never forgive him for dancing around like a buffoon, in his jock-strap, after he poured a bucket of ice-water over Harry, during an interview, after our cup final win.

It wasn't that he "iced" Redknapp, that pissed me off, but the fact that he was on my TV screen, dancing around in his jock-strap.
 
You might have enjoyed that, actually, PIXIE, now that I come to think of it.

It might have reminded you of those clubs that you like to frequent.
 
I think we all know who likes to go on about gay porn on here mate. <ok> If it's not that, it's masturbating monkey and Rhino's that you're salivating over. Maybe you should be looking for a different type of forum to play out your fantasies on.
 
Yeah.... except that I haven't been "owned," have I?

Tobes is talking out of his arse, and completely ignoring what the law actually says about defaming professional persons.

Would anyone actually care to quote section 2 of the Defamation Act 1952?

Tobes reckons that the 2013 Act replaces the 1952 Act, but it doesn't. It repeals section 6 of the 1952 Act, but everything else, including section 2, remains in place.

This stuff is Libel Law 101.
 
Yeah.... except that I haven't been "owned," have I?

Tobes is talking out of his arse, and completely ignoring what the law actually says about defaming professional persons.

Would anyone actually care to quote section 2 of the Defamation Act 1952?

Tobes reckons that the 2013 Act replaces the 1952 Act, but it doesn't. It repeals section 6 of the 1952 Act, but everything else, including section 2, remains in place.

This stuff is Libel Law 101.
You've wasted a lot of your afternoon Googling in panic!
 
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE
For reasons that I am not prepared to go into, I can assure you I know a lot about defamation law.