Dom Pérignon (1638–1715) was a Monk (fact)
He was - been to the Moët Champage house in Epernay.
And Taittinger and Veuve Clicquot - Love the Champagne region!
Dom Pérignon (1638–1715) was a Monk (fact)

Just seen on Facebook that it's Monk and will be announced on Wednesday? But nothing on here. It's bollocks then.
Garry Monk would be nice.. long contract too please, lets stop ****ing around switching managers.
It must be Tri a Fcuk on his rounds again.A pint not a bottle of Blue Nun?
I would like to give that Slutsky a chance done ok in russia so may have same effect silva did when he came in.
OLM posted that about 9am
He's the best we're likely to get.
Agreed, I'd be really happy and pleasantly surprised as not only is he a good, progressive manager with an attractive style but it would also really piss off those TWS ****s.
The only way it could get better was he joined us, then raided them for their best players. Now that would be hilarious.
I'd be very happy if we appointed Monk.
He should never have got the sack at Swansea and he did an excellent job with one of the weakest teams in Yorkshire.
Hopefully this is just not just a typical bookmakers trick.
Plus i also thought it was a criminal offence for bookmakers to manipulate betting oddsTypical trick? They don't move odds on a whim, they move them on betting habits. The only reason Monk has dropped is because people are betting on him.
Plus i also thought it was a criminal offence for bookmakers to manipulate betting odds
I bookie could put someone to 8/1 when really they're 25/1 this could entice some to have a bet at 8/1 thinking they've got in before the odd come in anymore? Then the bookie COULD make a killing as long as the bet doesn't actually come in? If that makes sense ( if it's it illegal I don't know ) I'm sure an expert will pull it to bits?In what way? They can set the odds at whatever they want.
Or do you mean falsifying reports that make people bet on certain outcomes?