The EU debate - Part III

[NSIS]

We forget the wider picture, the cultures that these people are coming from very much adhere to this sort of system, this has a negative effect on the countries that those people will then move to.

First part of your second sentence is very Islamophobic and racist. And when all else fails just talk about other religions...

In what world is my statement islamaphobic and racist?? I love to hear your explanation!

There is no wider picture. Certain elements in Islam believe that women are subservient to men, not all.

Plus your assertion ignores the fact that Muslim countries, such as Pakistan, have had Female leaders.

 

[Stan]

Why does it matter?

It's an observation.

 

[The Prime Minister]

You really are just proving that you still don't understand basic maths.

We are not talking about basic maths you muppet, stop doing a Tobes and trying to change the question.

 

[The Prime Minister]

In what world is my statement islamaphobic and racist?? I love to hear your explanation!

There is no wider picture. Certain elements in Islam believe that women are subservient to men, not all.

Plus your assertion ignores the fact that Muslim countries, such as Pakistan, have had Female leaders.

That went well she was murdered.

 

[Star of David Bardsley]

We are not talking about basic maths you muppet, stop doing a Tobes and trying to change the question.

We are talking about basic maths because you don't understand the numbers, you dolt.

 

[NSIS]

That went well she was murdered.

Not while she was prime minister.


And that ignores the fact that she was elected in the first place.

 

[Stan]

We are talking about basic maths because you don't understand the numbers, you dolt.

So we've established that not only is he illiterate but he's also numerically challenged. I bet he still has to wear velcro shoes.

 

[The Prime Minister]

We are talking about basic maths because you don't understand the numbers, you dolt.

Stick with the original question cupcake. We are not talking about maths in the general scene.

What the Lib Dems gained is nothing of note, because they had only a few votes in the first place.

So

5% of nothing is still nothing.

I will leave you to it, I have things to do.

Good evening all, its sparing time

 

[Blueman]

It's an observation.

How very observant? Ok I'll piss of now.

 

[Star of David Bardsley]

Stick with the original question cupcake. We are not talking about maths in the general scene.

What the Lib Dems gained is nothing of note, because they had only a few votes in the first place.

So

5% of nothing is still nothing.

I will leave you to it, I have things to do.

Good evening all, its sparing time

By that logic if they got 100% of the vote it would be meaningless. Their vote share doubled. Percentages confuse you.

 

[Blueman]

By that logic if they got 100% of the vote it would be meaningless. Their vote share doubled. Percentages confuse you.

Just percentages?

 

[Star of David Bardsley]

Just percentages?

Six letter words can be tough too.

 

[PleaseNotPoll]

https://www.theguardian.com/culture...oscar-wilde-champagne-socialist-voting-labour

I didn't ask if he self-described as being left-wing, I asked if he was the left.
He's one random bloke, who's massively up himself.
He has no power, very little influence and is largely irrelevant.

Nice to see you giving Farage a pass again, though.
His attempts to turn the UK into a tax haven are lovely. Much better than doing his actual job, eh?

 

[PleaseNotPoll]

It doesn't really work like that, humans are capable of being inhuman, this is demonstrated by women being treated as lesser people than men in Islam.

I know they have no legal jurisdiction, but they are still allowed to operate and I am willing to bet that nothing serious will done about them, they have enough support to continue and will undoubtedly be used as another tool for the UK to help Muslims 'integrate'. I think I'd disagree with the whole 'voluntary' element of it too, considering the whole issue with forced marriages and what not.

It's not inhuman. It's ****, but it's not inhuman.

I'm not particularly sold on religious courts as civil arbitration either, though I'm not convinced by your reasoning.
There's a question of how voluntary it really is in a religious community.
Is regulation the answer? Maybe. They'll exist anyway and I can't really see how you can outlaw them.

What do they have to do with forced marriages?

 

[PleaseNotPoll]

That went well she was murdered.

Good job we don't have any female politicians getting murdered over here by terrorists, eh?

 

[Stan]

Stick with the original question cupcake. We are not talking about maths in the general scene.

What the Lib Dems gained is nothing of note, because they had only a few votes in the first place.

So

5% of nothing is still nothing.

I will leave you to it, I have things to do.

Good evening all, its sparing time

What level Dan are you?

 

[aberdude]

not sure if you've noticed lads but wife beating is not just an Islamic trait.......in fact domestic violence against women is very much alive and kicking in western world..............so please don't generalise for your own needs

 

[Blueman]

Good job we don't have any female politicians getting murdered over here by terrorists, eh?

Not trying to get too involved with this but would you call women being stoned to death inhuman?

 

[PleaseNotPoll]

Not trying to get too involved with this but would you call women being stoned to death inhuman?

Yes. I'm not defending Islam or Sharia, just to clarify my position.
The Abrahamic religions all use stoning as a punishment for various things and I'm against the death penalty.

 

[aberdude]

Not trying to get too involved with this but would you call women being stoned to death inhuman?

humans a capable of all sorts of atrocities>>>>>>look at Monsanto/bayer for instance