The EU debate - Part III

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
DMD said:
It seems the by-election result was only advisory, and Zac Goldsmith remains the MP.:emoticon-0109-kiss:
Click to expand...

Nice try. It was in fact an election, not a referendum. So the Tory poster boy is ****ed off out of it, having lost.

Flirting with islamophobia in his bid to become Mayor of London, coupled with his support for Brexit, has not endeared Mr Goldenballs to his local electorate. In Hull or similar blighted ****holes, being a bit of a borderline racist might have worked in his favour, but not in leafy Richmond, despite the number of copies of the Telegraph and Mail that doubtless get sold down there. There is hope for common sense and decency, after all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PleaseNotPoll and Tobes
NowsufferinginSpain said:
To me, the result in Richmond is starting to show what was discussed a while back. Namely that people are tiring of extremist policies from the two main parties.

To most, it looks as though the Tory party has been hijacked by the far right wing. People like Fox and Davis, who resemble far too closely Farage and UKIP for a lot of people's liking. Plus May looks increasingly out of her depth. And many feel they are being railroaded by the Tories into a Brexit they neither voted for, nor want.

The Labour Party has been similarly hijacked by Corbyn and his bunch of 1970's throwbacks. He and his party are totally unelectable, and most people know it.

It's hardly surprising to see people voting for some more moderation politically.
Click to expand...

Do you really think Lib Dems would win big in other areas, because we both know that would not happen
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
Archers Road said:
See my reply to KFC. Obviously if you live in the festering crapholes of Britain, the right continue to thrive.
Click to expand...

So every area outside London is a festering ****hole then, I would have called it the othe rway around myself.
I will stick to rolling fields and sheep :bandit:, you can stick with concrete high rise flats and 7 million or so inhabitants.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archers Road and DMD
I'm glad he lost. The lefties rioting and bleating about it all being rigged, as they do, could have soured the Christmas build up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: petersaxton
petersaxton said:
Why not let people in that can do a job that we can't get British people to do but only if they have health insurance, accommodation and can pay for their children's education?
Click to expand...
When you smuggled Ula into the country did she do a job that no British person could do? Did she pay for healthcare, her own accommodation and her daughter's education or did she do a job that millions of Brits could do, live with you, use the NHS and stick her daughter into a local state school? She must have been pretty broke after she gave you her life savings to pay off your debts you hypocritical failure <ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: PleaseNotPoll, Saints_Alive and Tobes
petersaxton said:
Zac didn't need to stand down. We need to build more runways at Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted. It's his own fault.
Click to expand...
He stood down on a point of principle as his party had shat on his election manifesto. The Tories continue to scrap amongst themselves. They're a ****ing shambles <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saints_Alive
Stan said:
When you smuggled Ula into the country did she do a job that no British person could do? Did she pay for healthcare, her own accommodation and her daughter's education or did she do a job that millions of Brits could do, live with you, use the NHS and stick her daughter into a local state school? She must have been pretty broke after she gave you her life savings to pay off your debts you hypocritical failure <ok>
Click to expand...
Shame the stupid **** won't get to read that, as I'd love to see his comeback
 
Stan said:
When you smuggled Ula into the country did she do a job that no British person could do? Did she pay for healthcare, her own accommodation and her daughter's education or did she do a job that millions of Brits could do, live with you, use the NHS and stick her daughter into a local state school? She must have been pretty broke after she gave you her life savings to pay off your debts you hypocritical failure <ok>
Click to expand...

Tbf no British woman could be expected to do that job. No amount of kitchen appliances could recompense her for such an undertaking.
 
During the negotiations the government needs to consider what is on offer. If it's better to pay for access to the single market without being subject to freedom of movement and the ECJ and still be able to negotiate trade deals with the rest of the world then by all means do it. The alternative is to pay the average of 3% tariffs and use the tariffs we get from the EU countries to reduce tax/spend on NHS/anything else we decide
There's nothing to panic about unless your name is Clegg/Farron/Blair/Geldof/Soubry/Abbott
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Prime Minister
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back