The EU debate - Part III

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
petersaxton said:
During the negotiations the government needs to consider what is on offer. If it's better to pay for access to the single market without being subject to freedom of movement and the ECJ and still be able to negotiate trade deals with the rest of the world then by all means do it. The alternative is to pay the average of 3% tariffs and use the tariffs we get from the EU countries to reduce tax/spend on NHS/anything else we decide
There's nothing to panic about unless your name is Clegg/Farron/Blair/Geldof/Soubry/Abbott
Click to expand...


People actually pay you for financial advice? You? Given your obvious monumental ignorance of economics, don't you think you might be guilty of fraud there?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saints_Alive
petersaxton said:
During the negotiations the government needs to consider what is on offer. If it's better to pay for access to the single market without being subject to freedom of movement and the ECJ and still be able to negotiate trade deals with the rest of the world then by all means do it. The alternative is to pay the average of 3% tariffs and use the tariffs we get from the EU countries to reduce tax/spend on NHS/anything else we decide
There's nothing to panic about unless your name is Clegg/Farron/Blair/Geldof/Soubry/Abbott
Click to expand...
Yeah spend the increased revenue Pete <doh>

What a ****ing idiot
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saints_Alive
petersaxton said:
During the negotiations the government needs to consider what is on offer. If it's better to pay for access to the single market without being subject to freedom of movement and the ECJ and still be able to negotiate trade deals with the rest of the world then by all means do it. The alternative is to pay the average of 3% tariffs and use the tariffs we get from the EU countries to reduce tax/spend on NHS/anything else we decide
There's nothing to panic about unless your name is Clegg/Farron/Blair/Geldof/Soubry/Abbott
Click to expand...

This is almost a complete u turn on a discussion I had with Pete months ago where he claimed we would never pay for single market access.

If as has been suggested we drop into the EFTA then handbrakes on immigration and free trade with other nations through the EFTA are all possible while remaining in the single market and paying a contribution to the EU.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back