The EU debate - Part III
- Thread starter Jürgenmeiʃter
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
I'm not suggesting anything, I'm asking a fairly straightforward question. When is enough, enough?
It's a nonsensical question, in my opinion.
It's too vague to be meaningful, which is why I've attempted to get you to clarify it.
Should there be any limits on immigration? Yes. There are.
Am I happy with the current levels? They're fairly reasonable as a whole.
Do I think that the rules are perfect? No.
70 million, 80 million, 90 million? 100 million? 150 million? Where is the line drawn?
30m. Kick half of the country out.
Obviously I don't mean that seriously, but it should point out that it's not a simple number, like you're asking for.
Where do you draw it and why?
How far would my car go if I just started driving until it died? I'm not telling you how much petrol is in the car, what speed I'll be going at or what car I have but I need an answer.
The mere fact that you're asking that question (which is ironic given that you're the child of an immigrant btw) shows that you think of immigration as an issue of over crowding. This country is nowhere near over crowded, and has continued it's economic growth in no small part due to immigration, and we'll continue to need immigration in the future.
If repatriation ever hits the table, I'd have the filth that raised a racist, white supremacist 'Christian' like you at the top of the list
Hope that helps
No wetty, I'm surrounded by acres of non immigrant razor wire
I take it your council block is full of 'em eh?
Why not let people in that can do a job that we can't get British people to do but only if they have health insurance, accommodation and can pay for their children's education?
- Status