The EU debate - Part III

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
petersaxton said:
you seem to be obsessed by the publication and less so with the information
don't you think your lack of critical thinking is a deep flaw?
Click to expand...
Do you really think that reproducing my own criticism of you is going to be effective?
It's as tedious and predictable as it was when DMD tried it.

I brought up the publication, as I assume that you didn't stumble upon that story while browsing the site in question.
Would that assumption be correct?

As for the story, I think that she has a worthwhile point, but I'm not sure why transgender bathrooms is suddenly an issue.
It's a creation. It simply hasn't been a problem.
 
Watford_R said:
Why not just give the answer if you know it?
Click to expand...


I don't know it. I assumed you did because of the claim you made, however, just for fun...

You said that a policy that required people to be self supporting was not free movement, so, for fun... I'm going to say that there isn't an EU country I could move to that would pay me benefits, and enable me to live without employment, so by your rules, they don't have free movement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Prime Minister
DMD said:
I don't know it. I assumed you did because of the claim you made, however, just for fun...

You said that a policy that required people to be self supporting was not free movement, so, for fun... I'm going to say that there isn't an EU country I could move to that would pay me benefits, and enable me to live without employment, so by your rules, they don't have free movement.
Click to expand...
Actually no he didn't, he said moving to a country on the proviso there was a job offer wasn't free movement, which it isn't

Happy to help <ok>
 
DMD said:
I don't know it. I assumed you did because of the claim you made, however, just for fun...

You said that a policy that required people to be self supporting was not free movement, so, for fun... I'm going to say that there isn't an EU country I could move to that would pay me benefits, and enable me to live without employment, so by your rules, they don't have free movement.
Click to expand...

Just for fun, why do benefits have to be part of free movement? My only "rule" is that freedom= freedom and movement = movement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tobes
Genuine question for those that don't see a problem with mass immigration, at what point would you say no more? I'd just like to see your perspectives.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back