The EU debate - Part III

'Slap in the face to Europe!' No vote will put Italy on track to leave EU, vows PM hopeful
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/738841/Northern-League-Matteo-Salvini-Italy-referendum-leave-EU

 

'Not a realistic prospect' Philip Hammond crushes Sturgeon's bid for special Brexit deal
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/738862/Brexit-SNP-Nicola-Sturgeon-Chancellor-Philip-Hammond

 

Labour's leading Brexiteer explains why it MUST be a 'hard' Brexit for Britain
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/738692/gisela-stuart-brexit-Labour-single-market-demands

 

Labour 'moderate' group backed by MPs seeks donations to fight Jeremy Corbyn's supporters
http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/labour-moderate-group-backed-mps-12258527

 

Labour MP Caroline Flint claims trans-friendly toilets are dangerous for women
http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2016/12/0...=feed&utm_campaign=Feed: Pinknews (Pink News)

 

Have you been at the Sherry again, Tubby?

Or is it the Polish vodka?....

 

Express, Mail, Express, Mail... Pink News?

 

The daft fat **** scans the Express and Daily Nazi for hate stories about immigrants and then obviously googles Labour news in the hope he'll find some more spam.

 

you seem to be obsessed by the publication and less so with the information
don't you think your lack of critical thinking is a deep flaw?

 

Do you really think that reproducing my own criticism of you is going to be effective?
It's as tedious and predictable as it was when DMD tried it.

I brought up the publication, as I assume that you didn't stumble upon that story while browsing the site in question.
Would that assumption be correct?

As for the story, I think that she has a worthwhile point, but I'm not sure why transgender bathrooms is suddenly an issue.
It's a creation. It simply hasn't been a problem.

 

I don't know it. I assumed you did because of the claim you made, however, just for fun...

You said that a policy that required people to be self supporting was not free movement, so, for fun... I'm going to say that there isn't an EU country I could move to that would pay me benefits, and enable me to live without employment, so by your rules, they don't have free movement.

 

Actually no he didn't, he said moving to a country on the proviso there was a job offer wasn't free movement, which it isn't

Happy to help

 

Just for fun, why do benefits have to be part of free movement? My only "rule" is that freedom= freedom and movement = movement.

 

Genuine question for those that don't see a problem with mass immigration, at what point would you say no more? I'd just like to see your perspectives.

 

So you'd go to a country to be homeless and hungry.

 

You're trying to find an angle that isn't there.

 

Roughly one person before they let you in, frankly.

 

Thanks for your contribution.

 

I won't be happy until the White British make up 0.1% of the population.

 

Does nobody want to answer this seriously?