I think that moment has passed. I think if he wanted to go into Ukraine he would have gone in there already. As it is now, Ukraine is the spoils of the EU empire
The EU debate - Part III
- Thread starter Jürgenmeiʃter
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
I think that moment has passed. I think if he wanted to go into Ukraine he would have gone in there already. As it is now, Ukraine is the spoils of the EU empire
He was corrected by a technicality in the interview, I think it's obvious what he meant though.
No, there isn't a difference. They're both as bad as each other!.
The rest of your post is just nonsense.
Hitchens is a far right apologist. His views are well known and well publicised. I, personally, have no time for him or his views.
Your attempts to dress him and his views up as anything other than what they are, are laughable!...
Donald Trump said Sunday that Russian President Vladimir Putin won't make a military move into Ukraine -- even though Putin already has done just that, seizing the country's Crimean Peninsula.
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/07/31/politics/donald-trump-russia-ukraine-crimea-putin/
If the initial one was out of context, so was you reply, as it misses the wider global implications.
I'm more than aware of O'Keefe's previous work, and also some of the the responses to conclusions drawn from the Pew report.
They haven't been substantiated, but haven't (yet) been 'totally' debunked either.
The standard of proof is still possibly stricter than some of the rhetoric hurled Trumps way.
It shows the state of politics when someone from a Political family, with many connections, is struggling against someone like Trump.
The lack of scrutiny her history and words get is astonishing. She really is a threat to world peace and the whole situation. like brexit, should be a wake up call.
So he said something stupid but it's obvious that he meant something else. Cracking.
Are you also an apologist for the way he's sexually abused women?
I've read his alleged policies, so please don't try to tell me what I've read and haven't read.
His so called policies are without any credibility or real substance.
Like the candidate, they're full of wind and piss!..
I don't know what Putin will or won't do in regards to Ukraine, it might depend on whether he reacts to the extreme provocations from western powers.
So you do think Trump was right despite the fact that Vlad's already sent some of his boys in?
Over time the number who have multi ethnic backgrounds are increasing and this will continue to happen. Get used to it or see yourself as a victimised minoritymay have a problem with that, I cant change my skin colour unless I get a few UV rays
What wider implications? Do you honestly think that any other major Western politician would give another answer?
Would you retaliate against Iran for a nuclear attack on Israel, Mr Trump? What do you think he'd say?
He's totally pro-Israel. There's absolutely no doubt what his answer would be.
So you're aware that he's a joke, a fraud and he's been caught doing this **** before, but you're still backing him?
Are you also aware that Trump's paying him for this illegally, via his foundation?
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/21/donald-trump-foundation-paid-james-okeefe-10000-in-2015-report/
Struggling against Trump?!
This is how I know that you don't use a variety of news sources. Even Bill O'Reilly's basically called time on him.
Well, they were both split in regards to the EU referendum, I'm not sure how that isn't a difference.
You can label him whatever you want, but I dare you to read what he's said on Russia and Ukraine, I think you're too scared because you know you won't know how to disagree with it.
I didn't say you hadn't read his policies, nor did I say you had.
Credibility in what regard? You don't think they're credible? Why? Which ones? All of them? Some of them? No real substance? How?
What wider implications? Do you honestly think that any other major Western politician would give another answer?
Would you retaliate against Iran for a nuclear attack on Israel, Mr Trump? What do you think he'd say?
He's totally pro-Israel. There's absolutely no doubt what his answer would be.
So you're aware that he's a joke, a fraud and he's been caught doing this **** before, but you're still backing him?
Are you also aware that Trump's paying him for this illegally, via his foundation?
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/21/donald-trump-foundation-paid-james-okeefe-10000-in-2015-report/
Struggling against Trump?!
This is how I know that you don't use a variety of news sources. Even Bill O'Reilly's basically called time on him.
She is struggling against Trump, even the bias polls show that.
I doubt the Clintons would want to get into a pissing contest over who funds what.
On Israel, maybe an article from the site I quote so often...http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Trump-and-Israel-Closer-than-one-might-think-454328
- Status