The EU debate - Part III

[NSIS]

Who says I don't want to hear them?

Who says I doubt it?

I'm just laughing at the duplicity of some of the so called facts.

Duplicity? What duplicity? Wtf are on about?...

They're not so called facts. They are facts. There is a legal challenge to the triggering of article 50 by May. Not a so called fact, but a fact!

Those leaked figures were produced by the Gvt's own treasury. Again, not a so called fact by you. Just a plain simple fact.

 

[DMD]

How am I on the wrong tack?

You said;
Such a flimsy system is better off dismantled and replaced with something more robust and with less excitable reactionaries involved

Which by definition means that you're saying the current free market economy doesn't work, I simply asked you what the alternatives are, and in my original reply made a joke about subsistence faming and goat trading.

So enlighten me, what alternative to the free market economy are you advocating?

It doesn't simply mean what your definition suggests and you're trying to imply. I'll explain later how you're on the wrong tack...again.

 

[Tobes]

Duplicity? What duplicity? Wtf are on about?...

They're not so called facts. They are facts. There is a legal challenge to the triggering of article 50 by May. Not a so called fact, but a fact!

Those leaked figures were produced by the Gvt's own treasury. Again, not a so called fact by you. Just a plain simple fact.

....and we can add to that;

The pound tanking is a fact

Some of the financial sector considering relocating their resources - fact

 

[DMD]

Duplicity? What duplicity? Wtf are on about?...

They're not so called facts. They are facts. There is a legal challenge to the triggering of article 50 by May. Not a so called fact, but a fact!

Those leaked figures were produced by the Gvt's own treasury. Again, not a so called fact by you. Just a plain simple fact.

They're not all facts, and if there was confidence by financiers in the case being found in favour of delaying or preventing Brexit then there wouldn't be the squeals about moving to the mainland. That's the duplicitous bit from posters on here.

 

[Tobes]

It doesn't simply mean what your definition suggests and you're trying to imply. I'll explain later how you're on the wrong tack...again.

Why not explain now, given that you've made 6 posts telling me I'm on the wrong tack but have made no effort to explain what mysterious alternative you could have possibly been alluding to?

 

[DMD]

Why not explain now, given that you've made 6 posts telling me I'm on the wrong tack but have made no effort to explain what mysterious alternative you could have possibly been alluding to?

Because experience shows it'll take time for you to first of all accept why your basic premise is wrong...again.

 

[Tobes]

They're not all facts, and if there was confidence by financiers in the case being found in favour of delaying or preventing Brexit then there wouldn't be the squeals about moving to the mainland. That's the duplicitous bit from posters on here.

Which ones aren't facts?

Quite how you conclude that posters who think that the case for a Commons vote being strong and simply stating the facts of what's happened in the last few days post May's hard brexit speech, makes them somehow duplicitous is beyond me. Please explain.

 

[Tobes]

Because experience shows it'll take time for you to first of all accept why your basic premise is wrong...again.

It wasn't my premise you tithead, it was yours.

What alternative system did you have in mind when you made that point? Simple really.

 

[steveninaster1]

They're not all facts, and if there was confidence by financiers in the case being found in favour of delaying or preventing Brexit then there wouldn't be the squeals about moving to the mainland. That's the duplicitous bit from posters on here.

That makes little sense. They aren't interested in how long or if Brexit happens. They are interested in whether business will be affected.

A leave that restricts trade will see some business move, a leave that doesn't will see it stay.

 

[Stan]

I've got some codeine and diazepam left over from when I slipped a disc.

 

[DMD]

It wasn't my premise you tithead, it was yours.

What alternative system did you have in mind when you made that point? Simple really.

Nope, you have done your tedious strawman thing yet again. Unlike you, it's not that simple.

 

[DMD]

That makes little sense. They aren't interested in how long or if Brexit happens. They are interested in whether business will be affected.

A leave that restricts trade will see some business move, a leave that doesn't will see it stay.

You're kind of making the point that gets ignored. We haven't left yet.

 

[DMD]

Which ones aren't facts?

Quite how you conclude that posters who think that the case for a Commons vote being strong and simply stating the facts of what's happened in the last few days post May's hard brexit speech, makes them somehow duplicitous is beyond me. Please explain.

You must log in or register to see images

 

[Stan]

Are Dull Hull and Fat Pete representative of the whole Hull board?

I might pop over and take a look when the pills have kicked in.

 

[Tobes]

Nope, you have done your tedious strawman thing yet again. Unlike you, it's not that simple.

Yawn.

Make that 8 posts without being able to explain why I was somehow wrong to make a glib joke about your supposed alternative to a free market economy

You still can't explain what that alternative is, as you patently haven't got a ****ing clue and need to consult the Icke files for some 'inspiration'

 

[Tobes]

You must log in or register to see images

The irony of you posting a straw man in reply to my post, when your assertion that posters was being duplicitous was exactly that, is hilarious.

You were definitely right when you admitted you're a thick **** the other day.

Don't participate if you can't make a structured argument and defend your posts with something meaningful

 

[NSIS]

They're not all facts, and if there was confidence by financiers in the case being found in favour of delaying or preventing Brexit then there wouldn't be the squeals about moving to the mainland. That's the duplicitous bit from posters on here.

You cretin!

The two things I posted are plain simple facts. Only a deluded ****wit, like you, would try to deny it!

You really get more boring and facile by the day.

 

[Stan]

You must log in or register to see images

 

[NSIS]

....and we can add to that;

The pound tanking is a fact

Some of the financial sector considering relocating their resources - fact

Mate, i don't know why I bother with the cretinous little tosser. He's got the intellect of a dead gerbil. He makes two kitchens look almost intelligent and reasonable.

 

[Tobes]

You cretin!

The two things I posted are plain simple facts. Only a deluded ****wit, like you, would try to deny it!

You really get more boring and facile by the day.

He's out of his depth.

He makes idiotic comments and then can't respond with anything of substance when they're ripped to shreds.

So he starts his deflection and bore them into submission tack. Rinse and repeat.

He'd do better to admit he was talking out his arse and we could move on - but the 'mighty' Dutch doesn't do wrong - ask the Hull board.