The EU debate - Part III

Duplicity? What duplicity? Wtf are on about?...

They're not so called facts. They are facts. There is a legal challenge to the triggering of article 50 by May. Not a so called fact, but a fact!

Those leaked figures were produced by the Gvt's own treasury. Again, not a so called fact by you. Just a plain simple fact.

 

It doesn't simply mean what your definition suggests and you're trying to imply. I'll explain later how you're on the wrong tack...again.

 

....and we can add to that;

The pound tanking is a fact

Some of the financial sector considering relocating their resources - fact

 

They're not all facts, and if there was confidence by financiers in the case being found in favour of delaying or preventing Brexit then there wouldn't be the squeals about moving to the mainland. That's the duplicitous bit from posters on here.

 

Why not explain now, given that you've made 6 posts telling me I'm on the wrong tack but have made no effort to explain what mysterious alternative you could have possibly been alluding to?

 

Because experience shows it'll take time for you to first of all accept why your basic premise is wrong...again.

 

Which ones aren't facts?

Quite how you conclude that posters who think that the case for a Commons vote being strong and simply stating the facts of what's happened in the last few days post May's hard brexit speech, makes them somehow duplicitous is beyond me. Please explain.

 

It wasn't my premise you tithead, it was yours.

What alternative system did you have in mind when you made that point? Simple really.

 

That makes little sense. They aren't interested in how long or if Brexit happens. They are interested in whether business will be affected.

A leave that restricts trade will see some business move, a leave that doesn't will see it stay.

 

I've got some codeine and diazepam left over from when I slipped a disc.

 

Nope, you have done your tedious strawman thing yet again. Unlike you, it's not that simple.

 

You're kind of making the point that gets ignored. We haven't left yet.

 

please log in to view this image

 

Are Dull Hull and Fat Pete representative of the whole Hull board?

I might pop over and take a look when the pills have kicked in.

 

Yawn.

Make that 8 posts without being able to explain why I was somehow wrong to make a glib joke about your supposed alternative to a free market economy

You still can't explain what that alternative is, as you patently haven't got a ****ing clue and need to consult the Icke files for some 'inspiration'

 

The irony of you posting a straw man in reply to my post, when your assertion that posters was being duplicitous was exactly that, is hilarious.

You were definitely right when you admitted you're a thick **** the other day.

Don't participate if you can't make a structured argument and defend your posts with something meaningful

 

You cretin!

The two things I posted are plain simple facts. Only a deluded ****wit, like you, would try to deny it!

You really get more boring and facile by the day.

 

Mate, i don't know why I bother with the cretinous little tosser. He's got the intellect of a dead gerbil. He makes two kitchens look almost intelligent and reasonable.

 

He's out of his depth.

He makes idiotic comments and then can't respond with anything of substance when they're ripped to shreds.

So he starts his deflection and bore them into submission tack. Rinse and repeat.

He'd do better to admit he was talking out his arse and we could move on - but the 'mighty' Dutch doesn't do wrong - ask the Hull board.