The EU debate - Part III

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
So you decided based on no information whatsoever. You've never heard or read anything from the bible or other religious books, or looked at the science or history angle? Spin away wee man, you used education to come to your conclusion. :emoticon-0102-bigsm:emoticon-0102-bigsm
Never looked at the science or history of it because I don't believe in god. It was mentioned at school but from the off I wasn't interested as its fairy stories in Stan's opinion. Mrs Stan seems to believe though.
 
@NowsufferinginSpain

I totally agree with this and if you really believe it too, why do you continually post negative forecasts and try to pass them off as fact? Every prophecy of doom is posted as though you know our future with total certainty.

So which is it, uncertain or certain? You can't have it both ways.

It's one of the questions I've asked. It begs the further question that if it's doom and gloom, rather than keep saying it, suggest a solution, because remaining isn't an option.
 
@NowsufferinginSpain

I totally agree with this and if you really believe it too, why do you continually post negative forecasts and try to pass them off as fact? Every prophecy of doom is posted as though you know our future with total certainty.

So which is it, uncertain or certain? You can't have it both ways.

As I later posted, the uncertainty that naturally would follow such a momentous decision has been exacerbated by the May & Co's dithering and in fighting.

Of course the future can never be predicted with complete certainty. But there was undoubtedly a higher degree of it before this decision. What is a fact, is that uncertainty has been greatly increased by Brexit.

It feels to me that business in general is not only uncertain, they mostly would rather this hadn't happened. The appetite for risk has been greatly diminished.
 
Never looked at the science or history of it because I don't believe in god. It was mentioned at school but from the off I wasn't interested as its fairy stories in Stan's opinion. Mrs Stan seems to believe though.

So you were educated in it and general science at school, which formed your opinion, or at least confirmed it. As much as you seem proud of your ignorance, by your own examples, you made an educated decision.
 
So you were educated in it at school, which formed your opinion, or at least confirmed it. As much as you seem proud of your ignorance, by your own examples, you made an educated decision.
An independent decision. Self educated. You seem to think Muslims need educating.

When you made the below comment the discussion was about the Queen. You randomly and bizarrely brought Mohammed and educating Muslims into the mix. Why?

"It's not all bad news. It shows even the most staunch muslim families can evolve and grow out of it with time and education."

http://www.not606.com/threads/the-eu-debate-part-ii.332715/page-249
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock and Tobes
An independent decision. Self educated. You seem to think Muslims need educating.

When you made the below comment the discussion was about the Queen. You randomly and bizarrely brought Mohammed and educating Muslims into the mix. Why?

"It's not all bad news. It shows even the most staunch muslim families can evolve and grow out of it with time and education."

http://www.not606.com/threads/the-eu-debate-part-ii.332715/page-249



Yep, you say you made an educated decision. You're saying exactly the same as me, albeit yours being allegedly self educated, just means you had a poor teacher. <doh>

If you look back at the discussion, you'll see why I mentioned the Queen. Some claim due to the inter-marriages of royal families, she can trace her blood line back to Mohammed. But as you went back to find the quote, you knew that already, and are just trying to wriggle now you realise you agree with what was a flippant remark.
 
Kustard, you really do dwell in your own little world, don't you?

Gina Miller is merely trying to get the Gvt to do what it should have been doing anyway. But, instead, had to be dragged into court to force them to do.

Repeating the facts seems to be the only hope of getting any form of penetration of some of the thicker skulls on here.

Round and round you go
 
Yep, you say you made an educated decision. You're saying exactly the same as me, albeit yours being allegedly self educated, just means you had a poor teacher. <doh>

If you look back at the discussion, you'll see why I mentioned the Queen. Some claim due to the inter-marriages of royal families, she can trace her blood line back to Mohammed. But as you went back to find the quote, you knew that already, and are just trying to wriggle now you realise you agree with what was a flippant remark.

There's a distinct difference between not having your own faith and pouring scorn on others faith, as you did with your Muslims comment.

As being an agnostic or atheist is merely a personal opinion, it doesn't mean that you have to take the stance of being definitively right, which you patently have.
 
There's a distinct difference between not having your own faith and pouring scorn on others faith, as you did with your Muslims comment.

As being an agnostic or atheist is merely a personal opinion, it doesn't mean that you have to take the stance of being definitively right, which you patently have.

I didn't pour scorn, and I don't claim to be definitively right. That's just the ****e spin others tried to apply.

I enjoyed the Life of Brian, as I reckon many on here did.
 
There's a distinct difference between not having your own faith and pouring scorn on others faith, as you did with your Muslims comment.

As being an agnostic or atheist is merely a personal opinion, it doesn't mean that you have to take the stance of being definitively right, which you patently have.

Went out with a muslim once.

Was quite an experience.
 
& what?

Inflation hasn't YET kicked in, and none of the effects of Brexit are being felt by the consumer - YET, as we've not got on the train - YET.

It's a pointless attempt to portray the post Brexit garden as being rosey, when we've not yet done anything but have a misguided vote.
Fair shout Tobes , so is thre any point in this discussion until after brexit? It seems as though there has been the same conversation for over a thousand pages.
 
Yep, you say you made an educated decision. You're saying exactly the same as me, albeit yours being allegedly self educated, just means you had a poor teacher. <doh>

If you look back at the discussion, you'll see why I mentioned the Queen. Some claim due to the inter-marriages of royal families, she can trace her blood line back to Mohammed. But as you went back to find the quote, you knew that already, and are just trying to wriggle now you realise you agree with what was a flippant remark.
The Queen was already being discussed, that wasn't brought up by you. You bizarrely and randomly brought Mohammed and educating Muslims into the discussion. Why?

I made a self educated decision. Why do you think Muslims need to be educated? Why focus on Muslims and not other religions when the discussion was about the Queen?

When you, Pete, Kustard etc talk about religion in a negative way it's always related to Islam. Why?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
Status
Not open for further replies.