The EU debate - Part III

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Fair shout Tobes , so is thre any point in this discussion until after brexit? It seems as though there has been the same conversation for over a thousand pages.
The challenge is to get Kustard to understand one single issue related to the Brexit referendum. There's a long stop date on June 23rd 2017. The winner gets a cup of teay.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tobes and Blueman
The Queen was already being discussed, that wasn't brought up by you. You bizarrely and randomly brought Mohammed and educating Muslims into the discussion. Why?

I made a self educated decision. Why do you think Muslims need to be educated? Why focus on Muslims and not other religions when the discussion was about the Queen?

When you, Pete, Kustard etc talk about religion in a negative way it's always related to Islam. Why?

You hold the same view as me. Why are you desperate to deny that, when you say it in your own words? <doh>

It says a lot that the best you could come up with to try to bail out t'other fool's daft claim is this ****e from ages back, that failed when it was first tried, and on the other times since, and will only do the same again, no matter how much you try to spin it.

It would have been easier just to let him stew in his daft claim.
 
Why do I have issues with myself? You think I don't like being mixed race which is why I abhor racism? That makes no sense wetty. Surely you're not pissed already?!
So why do you think you abhor racism more than anyone else here?......
2 possible answers:You've either suffered racial abuse personally or you're not happy
being mixed race yourself.
 
You hold the same view as me. Why are you desperate to deny that, when you say it in your own words? <doh>

It says a lot that the best you could come up with to try to bail out t'other fool's daft claim is this ****e from ages back, that failed when it was first tried, and on the other times since, and will only do the same again, no matter how much you try to spin it.

It would have been easier just to let him stew in his daft claim.
Why did you bring Mohammed and educating Muslims into a discussion about the Queen?
 
Fair shout Tobes , so is thre any point in this discussion until after brexit? It seems as though there has been the same conversation for over a thousand pages.
It's all about opinions mate, we're discussing the potential outcomes, but you're right until the Govts actual plan is shared then it's trying to second guess their stance and then the EU's response to it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blueman
The challenge is to get Kustard to understand one single issue related to the Brexit referendum. There's a long stop date on June 23rd 2017. The winner gets a cup of teay.
Oops! I gave you a like. Skywanker will be livid. <laugh>
 
Why did you bring Mohammed and educating Muslims into a discussion about the Queen?

I've posted the answer to that when you asked it last time. <doh>:emoticon-0114-dull:

I pointed out that if you read the thread you linked, it explained it there too. Some claim she shares a blood line with Mohamed.

Why are you so desperate to repeatedly screw up discussions?
 
The Dutch <yikes>

When the **** did they invade? Unless you're talking about shed loads of ecstacy from Amsterdam. Not sure that counts as an invasion tbh.

Dutch successfully invaded under William of Orange in late 1600's (with a lot of blessing from us as he was a protestant).

A lot of our slang words and phrases can been seen - 'Dutch courage' and 'Dutch rudder' and 'Dutch oven'.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
So why do you think you abhor racism more than anyone else here?......
2 possible answers:You've either suffered racial abuse personally or you're not happy
being mixed race yourself.
Lots of people on here abhor racism. Many of them aren't mixed race.

How would not being happy that I'm mixed race influence my view that I find racism abhorrent? That makes absolutely no sense. Surely that would lead me in the polar opposite direction.

You haven't thought this one through at all wetty as you're still stuck in your 80's time warp chucking banana skins at the black Chelsea players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock and Tobes
Apart from the proof that you don't want to acknowledge is proof.

Would that be the one that some one had to dig back an age to find and that isn't proof at all, and that they and others hold the same view on. <doh>
 
I've posted the answer to that when you asked it last time. <doh>:emoticon-0114-dull:

I pointed out that if you read the thread you linked, it explained it there too. Some claim she shares a blood line with Mohamed.

Why are you so desperate to repeatedly screw up discussions?
I've read the thread. There was a discussion about the queen and then out of the blue you started prattling on about Mohammed and Muslims needing to be educated. Totally random and incredibly transparent.
 
I've read the thread. There was a discussion about the queen and then out of the blue you started prattling on about Mohammed and Muslims needing to be educated. Totally random and incredibly transparent.


Of course. Good luck with the rest of your education. I just hope you find a better tutor. :emoticon-0105-wink:
 
Lots of people on here abhor racism. Many of them aren't mixed race.

How would not being happy that I'm mixed race influence my view that I find racism abhorrent? That makes absolutely no sense. Surely that would lead me in the polar opposite direction.

You haven't thought this one through at all wetty as you're still stuck in your 80's time warp chucking banana skins at the black Chelsea players.
Theres a reason your more sensitive to the issue.Fair enough you don't want to declare it
on here.
 
Would that be the one that some one had to dig back an age to find and that isn't proof at all, and that they and others hold the same view on. <doh>

Hitler said some ****ty things a long time ago. Being a long time ago doesn't stop them being ****ty.

It was quite blantant Islamophobia here in the real world, just not in yours.
 
Would that be the one that some one had to dig back an age to find and that isn't proof at all, and that they and others hold the same view on. <doh>
You made your comment about educating Muslims after having spent days supposedly wanting to educate yourself on Islam on the thread on the subject.

Which was patently disingenuous and you were called out on it at the time. Your subsequent comment about educating Muslims proved it was a sham, as your view was obviously entrenched about their religion
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
Dutch successfully invaded under William of Orange in late 1600's (with a lot of blessing from us as he was a protestant).

A lot of our slang words and phrases can been seen - 'Dutch courage' and 'Dutch rudder' and 'Dutch oven'.

Don't forget 'Dutch fun' & 'Dutch cap'.

I still don't think they ever invaded though; they did once sail up the Thames and sink a few of our ships before buggering off back to the Dam.

And William III was invited to become monarch by a parliament that didn't want another Stewart with Papish sympathies.
 
Hitler said some ****ty things a long time ago. Being a long time ago doesn't stop them being ****ty.

It was quite blantant Islamophobia here in the real world, just not in yours.

You'd best tell Stan. He can add Islamaphobia to his joy at the suffering of migrants. :emoticon-0105-wink:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.